Abstract Cauchy priori distribution-based Bayesian AVO reflectivity inversion may lead to sparse estimates that are sensitive to large reflectivities. For the inversion, the computation of the covariance matrix and regularized terms requires prior estimation of model parameters, which makes the iterative inversion weakly nonlinear. At the same time, the relations among the model parameters are assumed linear. Furthermore, the reflectivities, the results of the inversion, or the elastic parameters with cumulative error recovered by integrating reflectivities are not well suited for detecting hydrocarbons and fluids. In contrast, in Bayesian linear AVO inversion, the elastic parameters can be directly extracted from prestack seismic data without linear assumptions for the model parameters. Considering the advantages of the abovementioned methods, the Bayesian AVO reflectivity inversion process is modified and Cauchy distribution is explored as a prior probability distribution and the time-variant covariance is also considered. Finally, we propose a new method for the weakly nonlinear AVO waveform inversion. Furthermore, the linear assumptions are abandoned and elastic parameters, such as P-wave velocity, S-wave velocity, and density, can be directly recovered from seismic data especially for interfaces with large reflectivities. Numerical analysis demonstrates that all the elastic parameters can be estimated from prestack seismic data even when the signal-to-noise ratio of the seismic data is low.
This work is supported by the National High-Tech Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) (No.2008AA093001).
Cite this article:
MA Ji-Qiang,GENG Jian-Hua. Cauchy prior distribution-based AVO elastic parameter estimation via weakly nonlinear waveform inversion[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2013, 10(4): 442-452.
[1]
Aki, K., and Richards, P. G., 1980, Quantitative seismology: theory and methods: W. H. Freeman and Co.
[2]
Buland, A., and Omre, H., 2003, Bayesian linearized AVO inversion: Geophysics, 68, 185 - 198.
[3]
Castagna, J. P., Batzle, M. L., and Eastwood, R. L., 1985, Relationships between compressional- wave and shear wave velocities in clastic silicate rocks: Geophysics, 50, 571 - 581.
[4]
Chen, J. J., and Yin, X. Y., 2007, Three-parameter AVO waveform inversion based on Bayesian theorem: Chinese J. Geophys., 50(4), 1251 - 1260.
[5]
Downton, J., and Chaveste, A, 2004, Calibrated three-term AVO to estimate density and water saturation: 2004 CSEG Convention Expanded Abstracts.
[6]
Downton, J. E., 2005, Seismic parameter estimation from AVO inversion: PhD Thesis, University of Calgary.
[7]
Gardner, G. H. F., Gardner, L.W., and Gregory, A. R., 1974, Formation velocity and density-The diagnostic basics for stratigraphic traps: Geophysics, 39, 770 - 780.
[8]
Ma, J. Q., Fu, G. P., and Geng, J. H., 2013, Full Zoeppritz equation-based elastic parameters Bayeisan generalized linear inversion. 75th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, London. DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.20130469.
[9]
Nocedal, J., and Wright, S. J., 1999, Numerical Optimization: Springer-Verlag, New York, American.
[10]
Sacchi, M. D., and Ulrych, T. D., 1995, High-resolution velocity gathers and offset space reconstruction: Geophysics, 60, 1169 - 1177.
[11]
Tarantola, A., 1987, Inverse problem theory, methods for data fitting and model parameter estimation: Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, Netherland.
[12]
Zhang, S. X., Yin, X. Y., and Zhang, F. C., 2011, Three-parameters pre-stack inversion based on Trivariate Cauchy probability distribution. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 46(5), 737 - 743.
2013, Vol. 10 
