APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
 
        Home  |  Copyright  |  About Journal  |  Editorial Board  |  Indexed-in  |  Subscriptions  |  Download  |  Contacts Us  |  中文
APPLIED GEOPHYSICS  2011, Vol. 8 Issue (3): 197-205    DOI: 10.1007/s11770-011-0285-1
article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
Gas sand distribution prediction by prestack elastic inversion based on rock physics modeling and analysis
He Fu-Bang1, You Jun2, and Chen Kai-Yuan1
1. Energy Resources College of China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China.
2. GNT International Inc., Beijing 100192, China.
 Download: PDF (1525 KB)   HTML ( KB)   Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Seismic inversion is one of the most widely used technologies for reservoir prediction. Many good results have been obtained but sometimes it fails to differentiate the lithologies and identify the fluids. However, seismic prestack elastic inversion based on rock physics modeling and analysis introduced in this paper is a significant method that can help seismic inversion and interpretation reach a new quantitative (or semi-quantitative) level from traditional qualitative interpretation. By doing rock physics modeling and forward perturbation analysis, we can quantitatively analyze the essential relationships between rock properties and seismic responses and try to find the sensitive elastic properties to the lithology, porosity, fluid type, and reservoir saturation. Finally, standard rock physics templates (RPT) can be built for specific reservoirs to guide seismic inversion interpretation results for reservoir characterization and fluids identification purpose. The gas sand distribution results of the case study in this paper proves that this method has unparalleled advantages over traditional post-stack methods, by which we can perform reservoir characterization and seismic data interpretation more quantitatively and efficiently.
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
HE Fu-Bang
YOU Jun
CHEN Kai-Yuan
Key wordsRock physics   seismic response   elastic parameters   elastic inversion   reservoir characterization   modeling     
Received: 2011-06-09;
About author: He Fu-Bang is studying on her PhD degree at China University of Geosciences (Beijing). She graduated from China University of Petroleum (Beijing) in 2004 where she received her Master’s degree majoring in geophysical prospecting (2004). Currently, her research mainly focuses on seismic rock physics, prestack seismic data inversion, and reservoir prediction.
Cite this article:   
HE Fu-Bang,YOU Jun,CHEN Kai-Yuan. Gas sand distribution prediction by prestack elastic inversion based on rock physics modeling and analysis[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2011, 8(3): 197-205.
 
[1] Aki, K., and Richards, P. G., 1980, Quantitative seismology: Theory and methods: W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.
[2] Avseth, P., Mukerji, T., and Mavko, G., 2005, Quantitative seismic interpretation: Applying rock physics tools to reduce interpretation risk: Cambridge University Press, UK.
[3] Castagna, J. P., Batzle, M. L., and Eastwood, R. L., 1985, Relationship between compressional-wave and shearwave velocities in clastic silicate rocks: Geophysics, 50, 571 - 581.
[4] Castagna, J. P., Batzle, M. L., and Kan, T. K., 1993, Rock physics - The link between rock properties and AVO response: in Castagna J. P., and Backus, M., Eds., Offset-dependent reflectivity - Theory and practice of AVO analysis, Investigations in Geophysics, No.8, Soc. Explor. Geophys., 135 - 171.
[5] Fatti, J. L., Smith, G. C., Vail, P. G., and et al., 1994, Detection of gas in sandstone reservoirs using AVO analysis: A 3-D seismic case story using the Geostack technique: Geophysics, 59, 1362 - 1376.
[6] Gelfand, V., Ng, P., Nguyen, H., and Larner, K., 1986, Seismic lithologic modeling of amplitude-versus-offset data: 56th Ann. Internat. Mtg. Soc. Explor. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 334 - 336.
[7] Gray, D., Goodway, W., and Chen, T., 1999, Bridging the gap: Using AVO to detect changes in fundamental elastic constants: 69th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 852 - 855.
[8] Greenberg, M. L., and Castagna, J. P., 1992, Shearwave velocity estimation in porous rocks: Theoretical formation, preliminary verification and applications: Geophysical Prospecting, 40, 195 - 210.
[9] 黄伟传, 杨长春, 范桃园, 麻三怀, 2007, 岩石物理分析在储层预测中的应用: 地球物理学进展, 22(6), 179l - 1795.
[10] King, M. S., 2005, Rock-physics developments in seismic exploration:A personal 50-year perspective: Geophysics, 70(6), 3ND - 8ND.
[11] Krief, M., Grant, J., Stellingwerff, J., and Ventre, J., 1990, A petrophysical interpretation using the velocities of P and S wave (full-waveform sonic): The Log Analyst, 31, 355 - 369.
[12] 李明, 侯连华, 邹才能, 殷积峰, 刘晓等著, 2005, 岩性地层油气藏地球物理勘探技术与应用: 石油工业出版社, 北京.
[13] Mavko, G., Mukerji, T., and Dvorkin, J., 2003, The rock physics handbook: Cambridge University Press, UK.
[14] Oslash;degaard, E., and Avseth P., 2004, Well log and seismic data analysis using rock physics templates: First Break, 22, 37 - 43.
[15] Raymer, L. L., Hunt, E. R., and Gardner, J. S., 1980, An improved sonic transit time-to-porosity transform: Soc. Professional Well Log Analysis (SPWLA), 21st Ann. Logg. Symp. Paper P.
[16] Shuey, R. T., 1985, A simplification of the Zoeppritz equation: Geophysics, 50, 609 - 614.
[17] 唐建伟, 2008, 地震岩石物理学研究有关问题的探讨: 石油物探, 47(4), 398 - 404.
[18] Xu, S. Y., and White, R. E., 1995, A new velocity for claysand mixtures: Geophysical Prospecting, 43(1), 91 - 118.
[19] Xu, S. Y., and White, R. E., 1996, A physical model for shear wave velocity prediction: Geophysical Prospecting, 44, 687 - 717.
[20] 徐胜峰, 李勇根, 曹宏, 姚逢昌, 2009, 地震岩石物理研究概述: 地球物理学进展, 24(2), 680 - 691.
[21] Ye, T. R., Tang, J. M., and John T., 2009, Application of P wave and shear wave joint inversion for deeper tight gas prediction in west Sichuan basin: CPS/SEG Beijing 2009 International Geophysical Conference & Exposition.
[1] Ma Ru-Peng, Ba Jing, Carcione José Maria, Zhou Xin, and Li Fan. Dispersion and attenuation of compressional waves in tight oil reservoirs: Experiments and simulations*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 16(1): 36-49.
[2] Qian Ke-Ran, He Zhi-Liang, Chen Ye-Quan, Liu Xi-Wu, Li Xiang-Yang. Prediction of brittleness based on anisotropic rock physics model for kerogen-rich shale[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(4): 463-480.
[3] Yang Zhi-Qiang, He Tao, Zou Chang-Chun. Shales in the Qiongzhusi and Wufeng–Longmaxi Formations: a rock-physics model and analysis of the effective pore aspect ratio[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(3): 325-336.
[4] Liu Xi-Wu, Guo Zhi-Qi, Liu Cai, Liu Yu-Wei. Anisotropy rock physics model for the Longmaxi shale gas reservoir, Sichuan Basin, China[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(1): 21-30.
[5] Liu Jie, Liu Jiang-Ping, Cheng Fei, Wang Jing, Liu Xiao-Xiao. Rock-physics models of hydrate-bearing sediments in permafrost, Qilian Mountains, China[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(1): 31-39.
[6] Fu Bo-Ye, Fu Li-Yun, Wei Wei, Zhang Yan. Boundary-reflected waves and ultrasonic coda waves in rock physics experiments[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(4): 667-682.
[7] Zong Zhao-Yun, Yin Xing-Yao, Li Kun. Joint AVO inversion in the time and frequency domain with Bayesian interference[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(4): 631-640.
[8] Shi Yan-Ling, Hu Zu-Zhi, Huang Wen-Hui, Wei Qiang, Zhang Sheng, Meng Cui-Xian, Ji Lian-Sheng. The distribution of deep source rocks in the GS Sag: joint MT–gravity modeling and constrained inversion[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(3): 469-479.
[9] Zhang Wen-Hui, Fu Li-Yun, Zhang Yan, Jin Wei-Jun. Computation of elastic properties of 3D digital cores from the Longmaxi shale[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(2): 364-374.
[10] Guo Zhi-Qi, Liu Cai, Liu Xi-Wu, Dong Ning, and Liu Yu-Wei. Research on anisotropy of shale oil reservoir based on rock physics model[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(2): 382-392.
[11] Luo Wei-Ping, Li Hong-Qi, and Shi Ning. Semi-supervised least squares support vector machine algorithm: application to offshore oil reservoir[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(2): 406-415.
[12] Li Sheng-Jie, Shao Yu, Chen Xu-Qiang. Anisotropic rock physics models for interpreting pore structures in carbonate reservoirs[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(1): 166-178.
[13] Zhu Chao, Guo Qing-Xin, Gong Qing-Shun, Liu Zhan-Guo, Li Sen-Ming, Huang Ge-Ping. Prestack forward modeling of tight reservoirs based on the Xu–White model[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2015, 12(3): 421-431.
[14] Pan Jian-Guo, Wang Hong-Bin, Li Chuang, Zhao Jian-Guo. Effect of pore structure on seismic rock-physics characteristics of dense carbonates[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2015, 12(1): 1-10.
[15] Huang Xin-Rui, Huang Jian-Ping, Li Zhen-Chun, Yang Qin-Yong, Sun Qi-Xing, Cui Wei. Brittleness index and seismic rock physics model for anisotropic tight-oil sandstone reservoirs[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2015, 12(1): 11-22.
Copyright © 2011 APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
Support by Beijing Magtech Co.ltd support@magtech.com.cn