Numerical simulations of full-wave fields and analysis of channel wave characteristics in 3-D coal mine roadway models
Yang Si-Tong1, Wei Jiu-Chuan1, Cheng Jiu-Long2, Shi Long-Qing1, and Wen Zhi-Jie3
1. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Depositional Mineralization & Sedimentary Minerals, College of Earth Sciences & Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.
2. State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China.
3. Key Laboratory of Mine Disaster Prevention and Control, Shandong University of Science & Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.
Abstract：
Currently, numerical simulations of seismic channel waves for the advance detection of geological structures in coal mine roadways focus mainly on modeling two-dimensional wave fields and therefore cannot accurately simulate three-dimensional (3-D) full-wave fields or seismic records in a full-space observation system. In this study, we use the first-order velocity–stress staggered-grid finite difference algorithm to simulate 3-D full-wave fields with P-wave sources in front of coal mine roadways. We determine the three components of velocity Vx, Vy, and Vz for the same node in 3-D staggered-grid finite difference models by calculating the average value of Vy, and Vz of the nodes around the same node. We ascertain the wave patterns and their propagation characteristics in both symmetrical and asymmetric coal mine roadway models. Our simulation results indicate that the Rayleigh channel wave is stronger than the Love channel wave in front of the roadway face. The reflected Rayleigh waves from the roadway face are concentrated in the coal seam, release less energy to the roof and floor, and propagate for a longer distance. There are surface waves and refraction head waves around the roadway. In the seismic records, the Rayleigh wave energy is stronger than that of the Love channel wave along coal walls of the roadway, and the interference of the head waves and surface waves with the Rayleigh channel wave is weaker than with the Love channel wave. It is thus difficult to identify the Love channel wave in the seismic records. Increasing the depth of the receivers in the coal walls can effectively weaken the interference of surface waves with the Rayleigh channel wave, but cannot weaken the interference of surface waves with the Love channel wave. Our research results also suggest that the Love channel wave, which is often used to detect geological structures in coal mine stopes, is not suitable for detecting geological structures in front of coal mine roadways. Instead, the Rayleigh channel wave can be used for the advance detection of geological structures in coal mine roadways.
. Numerical simulations of full-wave fields and analysis of channel wave characteristics in 3-D coal mine roadway models[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(4): 621-630.
[1]
Bakku, S., Fehler, M., and Burns, D., 2013, Fracture compliance estimation using borehole tube waves: Geophysics, 78(4), 249−260.
[2]
Bohlen, T., 1998, Interpretation of measured seismograms by means of viscoelastic finite difference modeling: PhD thesis, Kiel University, Germany.
[3]
Buchanan, D. J., 1986, The scattering of SH-channel waves by a fault in a coal seam: Geophysical Prospecting, 34(3), 343−365.
[4]
Buchanan, D. J., Jackson, P. J., Taylor, P. M., and Doyle, J. F., 1981, The use of channel wave seismology to find faults in coal seams: Proceedings of the 50th SEG Meeting, Houston, 2985−3018.
[5]
Crase, E., 1990, High-order (space and time) finite-difference modeling of the elastic wave equation: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 987−991.
[6]
Dresen L., and Ruter H., 1994, Seismic coal exploration, Part B: in-seam seismic: Pergamon Pr., New York.
[7]
Essen, K., Bohlen, T., Friederich, W., and Meier, T., 2007, Modelling of Rayleigh-type seam waves in disturbed coal seams and around a coal mine roadway: Geophys. J. Int., 170(2), 511−526.
[8]
Evison, F. F., 1955, A coal seam as a guide for seismic for seismic energy: Nature, 176(4495), 1224−1225.
[9]
Hatherly, P. J., 1987, Coal seam mapping by underground in-seam seismic survey: Geoexploration, 24(4−5), 285−294.
[10]
Hu, Y. R., and McMechan, G. A., 2007, Imaging mining hazards within coalbeds using prestack wave equation migration of in-seam seismic survey data: A feasibility study with synthetic data: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 63(1), 24−34.
[11]
Jetschny, S., Bohlen, T., and Kurzmann, A., 2011, Seismic prediction of geological structures ahead of the tunnel using tunnel surface waves: Geophysical Prospecting, 59(5), 934−946.
[12]
Krey, T. C., 1963, Channel waves as a tool of applied geophysics in coal seam mining: Geophysics, 28(5), 701−704.
[13]
Levander, A. R., 1988, Four-order finite-difference P-SV seismograms: Geophysics, 53(11), 1425−1436.
[14]
Liu, T. F., Pan, D. M., Li, D. C., and Li, H. Y., 1994, Channel wave seismic exploration (in Chinese): China University of Mining and Technology press, Xuzhou, China.
[15]
Liu, Z. G., and Liu, X. F., 2003, TSP application and development in tunnel lead forecast: Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering (in Chinese), 22(8), 1399−1402.
[16]
Qin, Z., Lu, M. H., Zheng, X. D., Yao, Y., Zhang, C., and Song, J. Y., 2009, The implementation of an improved NPML absorbing boundary condition in elastic wave modeling: Applied Geophysics, 6(2), 113−121.
[17]
Ricker, N., 1953, The form and laws of propagation of seismic wavelets: Geophysics, 18(1), 10−40.
[18]
Tang, X. M., Qi, X., Zhang, B., Li, S. Q., and Su, Y. D., 2015, Aninterference-based array signal processing technique for cased-hole acoustic logging and applications: Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 58(4), 1447−1457.
[19]
Tsang, L., and Kong, J. A., 1979, Asymptotic methods for the first compressional head wave arrival in a fluid-filled borehole: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 65(3), 647−654.
Xiao, K. H., 2012, Tunnel advanced prediction geophysical method and application research: PhD Thesis, (in Chinese), Chengdu University of Technology, China.
[22]
Yang, S. T., and Cheng, J. L., 2012, The method of small structure prediction ahead with Rayleigh channel wave in coal roadway and seismic wave field numerical simulation: Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 55(2), 655−662.
[23]
Yang, X. H., Cao, S. Y., Li, D. C., Yu, P. F., and Zhang, H. R., 2014, Analysis of quality factors for Rayleigh channel waves : Applied Geophysics, 11(1), 107−114.
[24]
Yang, Z., Feng, T., and Wang, S., 2010, Dispersion characteristics and wave shape mode of SH channel wave in 0.9 m-thin coal seam: Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 53(2), 442−449.
[25]
Zeng, Z. H., 1994, Prediction ahead of the tunnel face by the seismic reflection methods: Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 37(2), 268−271.
[26]
Zhang, H., L., Wang, X. M., and Zhang, B. X., 2004, Borehole acoustic field and wave: Science Press (in Chinese), Beijing, 33−34.
[27]
Zhang, X. M., Zhang, H. L., and Wang, X. M., 2009, Leaky modes and their contributions to thecompressional head wave in a borehole excitedby a dipole source: Science in China, 52(5), 676−684.
2016, Vol. 13 
