APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
 
        Home  |  Copyright  |  About Journal  |  Editorial Board  |  Indexed-in  |  Subscriptions  |  Download  |  Contacts Us  |  中文
APPLIED GEOPHYSICS  2009, Vol. 6 Issue (4): 311-318    DOI: 10.1007/s11770-009-0040-z
article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
2D numerical study on the effect of conductor between the transmitter and survey area in CSEM exploration
Wang Ruo1, Wang Miaoyue1, Di Qing-Yun1, and Wang Guang Jie1
1. Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China.
 Download: PDF (779 KB)   HTML ( KB)   Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract In CSEM exploration, the receivers are generally located about three to five times the skin depth from the transmitter. In this paper, we study the effect of a conductor between the transmitter and the survey area on the target conductor response using forward modeling and inversion. The 2D forward finite element calculations show that the conductor mainly affects the response at middle and low frequencies. The lower the resistivity and the larger the conductor, the larger the effect and the effect increases with decreasing frequency. The inversion results indicate that the calculated position of the target body can move towards the source, leading to an incorrect interpretation without considering the conductor. In order to reduce the effect of a conductor between the source and the survey area, CSEM acquisition should be conducted in three dimensions using multiple sources and 3D inversion should be used during interpretation.
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
WANG Ruo
WANG Miao-Yue
DI Qing-Yun
WANG Guang-Jie
Key wordsCSEM exploration   2D line source   low resistivity body   forward modeling   inversion     
Received: 2009-07-01;
Fund:

The work is supported by the Project kzcx2-yw-113, kzcx2-yw-121 and kzcx1-yw-15-4, CAS.

Cite this article:   
WANG Ruo,WANG Miao-Yue,DI Qing-Yun et al. 2D numerical study on the effect of conductor between the transmitter and survey area in CSEM exploration[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2009, 6(4): 311-318.
 
[1] Bartel, L.C., and Jacobson., R. D., 1987, Results of a controlled-source audio frequency magnetotelluric survey at the Puhimau thermal area, Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii: Geophysics, 5, 665 - 677.
[2] Boschetto, N. B., and Hohmann, G. W., 1991, Controlled-source audio frequency magnetotelluric responses of three-dimensional bodies: Geophysics, 56, 255-264.
[3] Chen, M. S., and Yan, S., 2005, Analytical study on field zones, record rules, shadow and source overprint effects in CSAMT exploration: Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 48, 951 - 958.
[4] Dey, A., and Morrison, H. F., 1979, Resistivity modeling for arbitrarily shaped three dimensional structures: Geophysics, 44, 753 - 780.
[5] He, J. S., 1990, The Control source audio-frequency magnetotelluric method: Zhongnan Industry University Press, Changsha, China1990.
[6] Kuznetzov, A. N., 1982, Distorting effects during electromagnetic sounding of horizontally non-uniform media using an artificial field source: Earth Physics, Izvestiya, 18, 130 - 137.
[7] Lu, X., Unsworth, M., and Booker, J., 1999, Rapid relaxation inversion of CSAMT data: Geophysics Journal International. 138, 381 - 392.
[8] Mitsuhata, Y., 2000, 2-D electromagnetic modeling by finite-element method with a dipole source and topography: Geophysics, 65, 465 - 475.
[9] Routh, P. S., and Oldenburg, D. W., 1999, Inversion of controlled-source audio-frequency magnetoteluric data for a horizontal-layered earth: Geophysics, 64, 1689 - 1697.
[10] Sasaki, Y., Yoneda, Y., and Matsuo, K., 1992, Resistivity imaging of controlled-source audio frequency magnetotelluric data: Geophysics, 57, 952 - 955.
[11] Smith, J. T., and Booker, J. R., 1991, Rapid inversion of two and three- dimensional magnetotelluric data: Journal of Geophysics Research, 96, 3905 - 3922.
[12] Wang, R., Wang, M. Y., and Di, Q. Y., 2006, Forward modeling of the electromagnetic field due to a line source in frequency domain using the finite element method: Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 49, 1700 - 1709.
[13] Wannamaker, P., 1997, Tensor CSAMT survey over the Sulphur Springs thermal area, Valles Caldera, New Mexico, U.S.A., Part I: Implications for structure of the western caldera: Geophysics, 62, 451 - 465.
[14] Ward, S. H., 1971, Electromagnetic theory for geophysical applications: Mining Geophysics, Vol. II, Theory: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa.
[15] Yamashita, M., Hollof, P. G., and Pelton, W. H., 1985, CSAMT case histories with a multi-channel CSAMT system and discussion of near-field data correction: 55th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 276 - 278.
[16] Zhang, J. F., Tang, J.T., Yu, Y., and Liu, C. S., 2009, Finite element numerical simulation on line control source based on quadratic interpolation: Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 39, 929 - 935.
[17] Zonge, K. L., and Hughes, L. J., 1991, Controlled source audio-frequency magnetotellurics: in Nabighian, M. N., ed., Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics, 2, Practice, Society of Exploration Geophysics, Tulsa, 713 - 809.
[1] Hou Zhen-Long, Huang Da-Nian, Wang En-De, and Cheng Hao. 3D density inversion of gravity gradiometry data with a multilevel hybrid parallel algorithm[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 16(2): 141-153.
[2] Liu Guo-Feng, Meng Xiao-Hong, Yu Zhen-Jiang, and Liu Ding-Jin. An efficient scheme for multi-GPU TTI reverse time migration*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 16(1): 61-69.
[3] Xie Wei, Wang Yan-Chun, Liu Xue-Qing, Bi Chen-Chen, Zhang Feng-Qi, Fang Yuan, and Tahir Azeem. Nonlinear joint PP–PS AVO inversion based on improved Bayesian inference and LSSVM*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 16(1): 70-82.
[4] Wang En-Jiang, Liu Yang, Ji Yu-Xin, Chen Tian-Sheng, and Liu Tao. Q full-waveform inversion based on the viscoacoustic equation*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 16(1): 83-98.
[5] Zhang Zhen-Bo, Xuan Yi-Hua, and Deng Yong. Simultaneous prestack inversion of variable-depth streamer seismic data*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 16(1): 99-108.
[6] Li Kun, Chen Long-Wei, Chen Qing-Rui, Dai Shi-Kun, Zhang Qian-Jiang, Zhao Dong-Dong, and Ling Jia-Xuan. Fast 3D forward modeling of the magnetic field and gradient tensor on an undulated surface[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(3-4): 500-512.
[7] Meng Zhao-Hai, Xu Xue-Chun, and Huang Da-Nian. Three-dimensional gravity inversion based on sparse recovery iteration using approximate zero norm[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(3-4): 524-535.
[8] Yang Hai-Yan, Li Feng-Ping, Chen Shen-En, Yue Jian-Hua, Guo Fu-Sheng, Chen Xiao, and Zhang Hua. An inversion of transient electromagnetic data from a conical source[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(3-4): 545-555.
[9] Cao Xiao-Yue, Yin Chang-Chun, Zhang Bo, Huang Xin, Liu Yun-He, and Cai Jing. 3D magnetotelluric inversions with unstructured finite-element and limited-memory quasi-Newton methods[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(3-4): 556-565.
[10] Liu Wei, Wang Yan-Chun, Li Jing-Ye, Liu Xue-Qing, and Xie Wei. Prestack AVA joint inversion of PP and PS waves using the vectorized reflectivity method[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(3-4): 448-465.
[11] Ma Qi-Qi and Sun Zan-Dong. Elastic modulus extraction based on generalized pre-stack PP–PS joint linear inversion[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(3-4): 466-480.
[12] Shi Cai-Wang and He Bing-Shou. Multiscale full-waveform inversion based on shot subsampling[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(2): 261-270.
[13] Gao Zong-Hui, Yin Chang-Chun, Qi Yan-Fu, Zhang Bo, Ren Xiu-Yan, and Lu Yong-Chao. Transdimensional Bayesian inversion of time-domain airborne EM data[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(2): 318-331.
[14] Sun Si-Yuan, Yin Chang-Chun, Gao Xiu-He, Liu Yun-He, and Ren Xiu-Yan. Gravity compression forward modeling and multiscale inversion based on wavelet transform[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(2): 342-352.
[15] Zhang Bo, Yin Chang-Chun, Liu Yun-He, Ren Xiu-Yan, Qi Yan-Fu, Cai Jing. 3D forward modeling and response analysis for marine CSEMs towed by two ships[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(1): 11-25.
Copyright © 2011 APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
Support by Beijing Magtech Co.ltd support@magtech.com.cn