Geophone-seabed coupling effect and its correction
Zhang Bao-Qing1,2,3, Zhou Hui1,2, Li Guo-Fa1,2, and Guo Jian-Qing3
1. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting (China University of Petroleum), Beijing 102249, China.
2. Key Laboratory of Geophysical Exploration of China National Petroleum Corporation, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China.
3. BGP Dagang Branch, PetroChina, Tianjin 300280, China.
Abstract：
By summing geophone and hydrophone data with opposite polarity responses to water layer reverberation, the ocean bottom cable dual-sensor acquisition technique can effectively eliminate reverberation, broaden the frequency bandwidth, and improve both the resolution and fidelity of the seismic data. It is thus widely used in industry. However, it is difficult to ensure good coupling of the geophones with the seabed because of the impact of ocean flow, seafloor topography, and field operations; therefore, geophone data are seriously affected by the transfer function of the geophone-seabed coupling system. As a result, geophone data frequently have low signal-to-noise ratios (S/N), which causes large differences in amplitude, frequency, and phases between geophone and hydrophone data that severely affect dual-sensor summation. In contrast, the hydrophone detects changes in brine pressure and has no coupling issues with the seabed; thus, hydrophone data always have good S/N. First, in this paper, the mathematical expression of the transfer function between geophone and seabed is presented. Second, the transfer function of the geophone-seabed is estimated using hydrophone data as reference traces, and finally, the coupling correction based on the estimated transfer function is implemented. Using this processing, the amplitude and phase differences between geophone and hydrophone data are removed, and the S/N of the geophone data are improved. Synthetic and real data examples then show that our method is feasible and practical.
Zhang Bao-Qing,Zhou Hui,Li Guo-Fa et al. Geophone-seabed coupling effect and its correction[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(1): 145-155.
[1]
Barr, F. J., and Sanders, J. I., 1989, Attenuation of water-column reverberations using pressure and velocity detectors in a water-bottom cable: 59th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 653−656.
[2]
Barr, F. J., 1998, Method for correction dual sensor data for imperfect geophone coupling using production seismic data: U.S. Patent 5724306.
[3]
Barr, F.J., Paffenholz, J., and Rabson, W., 1996, The dual-sensor ocean-bottom cable method: comparative geophysical attributes, quantitative geophone coupling analysis and other recent advances: 66th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 21-23.
[4]
Dragoset, B., and Barr, F. J., 1994, Ocean-bottom cable Dual-Sensor scaling: 64th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 857−860.
[5]
Drijkoningen, G. G., Redemakers, F., Slobe, E. C., et al., 2006, A new elastic model for ground coupling of geophones with spikes: Geophysics, 71(2), 9−17.
[6]
Gaiser, J., Barr, F., and Paffenholz, J., 2002a, Vertical component coupling of OBC-data: 64th EAGE Conf. and Tech. Exhibit., Florence, Extended Abstracts, E07.
[7]
Gaiser, J., Melbø A., and Barr, F., 2002b, Vector fidelity of OBC data and seafloor coupling of the vertical component: Offshore Technology Conference, 1−7.
[8]
Gaiser, J., 1998, Compensating OBC data for variations in geophone coupling: 68th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1429−1432.
[9]
Gaiser, J., 2007, Detector coupling corrections for vector infidelity of multicomponent OBC data: Geophysics, 72(3), 67−77.
[10]
Gao S.W., Zhao B., Gao X., et al. 2015, A method for OBC dual-sensor data matching: Oil Geophysical Prospecting (In Chinese), 50(1), 29−32.
[11]
Krohn, C. E., 1984, Geophone ground coupling: Geophysics, 49(6), 722−731.
[12]
Krohn, C. E., 1985, Geophone ground coupling: The Leading Edge, 4(4), 56−60.
[13]
Landschulze, M., Mjelde, R., and Løvheim, L., 2012, Estimation of OBC coupling to the seafloor using 4C seismic data: 82ed Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1−5.
[14]
Li, P. C., Sheng, G. T., Xie, S. L., et al., 2012, Research on geophone coupling mechanism: Equipment for Geophysical Prospecting (In Chinese), 22(4), 218−221.
[15]
Shi, Z. J., Tian, G., and Dong, S. X., 2005, Match filtering of geophone coupling for high frequencies of seismic data in desert area: Geophysical Processing for Petroleum (In Chinese), 44(3), 261−263.
[16]
Soubaras, R., 1996, Ocean bottom hydrophone and geo-phone processing: 66th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 24−27.
[17]
Sun, C. Y., 1993, Discussion on the geophone-ground coupling problem: Petroleum Instruments (In Chinese), 7(4), 217−221.
[18]
Vos, J., Cremers, B. B., Drijkoningen, G. G., et al., 1995, A theoretical and experimental approach to the geophone ground coupling problem based on acoustic reciprocity: 65th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1003−1006.
[19]
Vos, J., Drijkoningen, G. G., and Fokkema, J. T., 1999, Sensor coupling in acoustic media using reciprocity: Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 105(4), 2252−2260.
[20]
Washburn, H., and Miley, H., 1941, The effect of the placement of a seismometer on its response characteristics: Geophysics, 6(2), 116−131.
[21]
Wei, J.D., 2013, The vibration mechanics explanation for ground-geophone coupling effect, mode identification and its impacting to seismic data and eliminating: Progress In Geophysics (In Chinese), 28(4), 1983−1995.
[22]
Zhang, H. J., Chen, H.L., Liang B.J, et al., 2014, A method to improve geophone coupling in OBC exploration: 84th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 249−253.
[23]
Zhang, W. B., and Zhu, G. M., 2005, Analysis and application of pressure and vertical of components of the ocean bottom cable: Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment (In Chinese), 27(1), 49−52.
[24]
Zhou, B, Gong, X. D., Gao, M. H., et al., 2015, An improvement of the dual-sensor summation technique for cross-ghosting from OBC and its application: China Offshore Oil and Gas (In Chinese), 27(1), 49−52.
2016, Vol. 13 
