APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
 
        首页  |  版权声明  |  期刊介绍  |  编 委 会  |  收录情况  |  期刊订阅  |  下载中心  |  联系我们  |  English
应用地球物理  2009, Vol. 6 Issue (4): 375-384    DOI: 10.1007/s11770-009-0035-9
论文 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
应用叠前反演弹性参数进行储层预测
陈双全1,2,王尚旭1,2,张永刚3,季敏4
1. 中国石油大学(北京)油气资源与探测国家重点实验室,北京 102249
2. 中国石油大学(北京)CNPC物探重点实验室,北京 102249
3. 中石化科技发展部,北京 100086
4. 中石化勘探开发研究院海外研究中心,北京 100086
Reservoir prediction using pre-stack inverted elastic parameters
Chen Shuang-Quan1,2, Wang Shang-Xu1,2, Zhang Yong-Gang3, and Ji Min4
1. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249 China.
2. CNPC Key Laboratory of Geophysical Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249 China.
3. Science and Technology Institute, China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation, Beijing 100086 China.
4. Overseas Research Center, Petroleum Research Institute of Exploration & Development, SINOPEC, Beijing 100086 China.
 全文: PDF (1163 KB)   HTML ( KB)   输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      背景资料
摘要 本文为利用叠前弹性参数反演进行致密性含气砂岩储层预测的一个实例研究。随着油气勘探开发发展,叠前地震数据及其反演结果的应用研究已经广泛用于实际生产中。叠前地震数据特征研究,不仅包括简单的AVO特性,还包括其他的弹性属性的变化特性。本文通过对含气砂岩弹性属性参数响应特征的分析,发现特定弹性属性参数或其组合可以作为流体检测因子。因此,可以利用叠前地震反演得到不同的弹性属性参数结果,进行储层解释和储层描述。该叠前反演方法是基于Zoeppritz方程的Aki-Richard简化公式建立起来的,根据测井数据和地质解释结果建立初始反演模型,反演中输入的地震数据为叠前时间或深度偏移的共反射点道集数据,反演结果可以是不同的弹性属性参数及其组合。通过对一实际的致密性含气砂岩储层进行叠前弹性属性参数反演,并将反演结果与其它预测结果进行对比分析发现,弹性属性参数λλρλ/µ,以及K/µ能够很好地预测含气储层,而且反演结果很好展现出储层中的含气特性。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
陈双全
王尚旭
张永刚
季敏
关键词弹性参数   叠前反演   储层预测   AVO特征   角道集     
Abstract: This is a case study of the application of pre-stack inverted elastic parameters to tight-sand reservoir prediction. With the development of oil and gas exploration, pre-stack data and inversion results are increasingly used for production objectives. The pre-stack seismic property studies include not only amplitude verse offset (AVO) but also the characteristics of other elastic property changes. In this paper, we analyze the elastic property parameters characteristics of gas- and wet-sands using data from four gas-sand core types. We found that some special elastic property parameters or combinations can be used to identify gas sands from water saturated sand. Thus, we can do reservoir interpretation and description using different elastic property data from the pre-stack seismic inversion processing. The pre-stack inversion method is based on the simplified Aki-Richard linear equation. The initial model can be generated from well log data and seismic and geologic interpreted horizons in the study area. The input seismic data is angle gathers generated from the common reflection gathers used in pre-stack time or depth migration. The inversion results are elastic property parameters or their combinations. We use a field data example to examine which elastic property parameters or combinations of parameters can most easily discriminate gas sands from background geology and which are most sensitive to pore-fluid content. Comparing the inversion results to well data, we found that it is useful to predict gas reservoirs using λ, λρ, λ/µ, and K/µ properties, which indicate the gas characteristics in the study reservoir.
Key wordselastic parameters   pre-stack inversion   reservoir prediction   AVO analysis   angle gather   
收稿日期: 2009-04-13;
基金资助:

本研究由国家“973”计划研究项目(编号:2007CB209600)和中国博士后科学基金资助项目的支持。

引用本文:   
陈双全,王尚旭,张永刚等. 应用叠前反演弹性参数进行储层预测[J]. 应用地球物理, 2009, 6(4): 375-384.
CHEN Shuang-Quan,WANG Shang-Xu,ZHANG Yong-Gang et al. Reservoir prediction using pre-stack inverted elastic parameters[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2009, 6(4): 375-384.
 
[1] Aki, K., and Richards, P. G., 1980, Quantitative seismology: Theory and methods: W. H. Freeman and Co.
[2] Castagna, J. P., Batzle, M. R., and Eastwood, R. L., 1985, Relationship between compressional-wave and shear-wave velocities in clastic silicate rocks: Geophysics, 50, 571 - 581.
[3] Castagna, J. P., Swanz, H. W., and Foster, D. J., 1998, Framework for AVO gradient and intercept interpretation: Geophysics, 63, 948 - 956.
[4] Chen, X. C., 1999, Essentials of geomodulus method: 69th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 764 - 767.
[5] Fatti, J. L., Smith, G. C., Vail, P. J., Strauss, P. J., and Levitt, P. R., 1994, Detection of gas in sandstone reservoirs using AVO analysis: A 3-D seismic case history using the Geostack technique: Geophysics, 59, 1362 - 1376.
[6] Feng, H., Bancroft, J., and Russell, B. H., 2007, A comparison of hydrocarbon indicators derived from AVO analysis: 77th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 279 - 282.
[7] Gardner, G. H. F., Gardner, L. W., and Gregory, A. R., 1974, Formation velocity and density - the diagnostic basis for stratigraphic traps: Geophysics, 39, 770 - 780.
[8] Goodway, W., Chen, T., and Downton, J., 1997, Improved AVO fluid detection and lithology discrimination using Lamé petrophysical parameters; “λρ”, “µρ”, & “λ/µ fluid stack”, from P and S inversions: 67th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts,183 - 186.
[9] Gray, D., Goodway, W., and Chen, T., 1999, Bridging the gap: Using AVO to detect changes in fundamental elastic constants: 69th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 852 - 855.
[10] Qiao Y. and An H., 2007, Study of petrophysical parameter sensitivity from well log data: Applied Geophysics, 4(4), 282 - 287.
[11] Russell, B. H., Hedlin, K., Hilterman, F. J., and Lines, L. R., 2003, Fluid-property discrimination with AVO: A Biot-Gassmann perspective: Geophysics, 68, 29 - 39.
[12] Shuey, R. T., 1985. A simplification of the Zoeppritz equations: Geophysics, 50, 609 - 614.
[13] Smith, G. C., and Gidlow, P. M., 1987, Weighted stacking for rock property estimation and detection of gas: Geophysical Prospecting, 35, 993 - 1014.
[14] Wang, Y., 1999, Approximations to the Zoeppritz equations and their use in AVO analysis: Geophysics, 64, 1920 -1927.
[15] Verm, R. W., and Hilterman, F. J., 1994, Lithologic color-coded sections by AVO crossplots: 64th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 1092 - 1095.
[16] Young, K. T., and Tatham, R. H., 2007, Multiple AVO analysis techniques to evaluate pore fluid saturant of bright spots in stacked sections, Columbus Basin, Offshore Trinidad: 77th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 283 - 287.
[1] 杨佳佳,栾锡武,何兵寿,方刚,潘军,冉伟民,蒋陶. 基于矢量波场逆时偏移的保幅角道集提取方法[J]. 应用地球物理, 2017, 14(4): 492-504.
[2] 宗兆云,印兴耀,李坤. 基于贝叶斯理论的时频域联合AVO反演方法研究[J]. 应用地球物理, 2016, 13(4): 631-640.
[3] 张文辉,符力耘,张艳,金维浚. 利用三维数字岩心计算龙马溪组页岩等效弹性参数[J]. 应用地球物理, 2016, 13(2): 364-374.
[4] 罗伟平,李洪奇,石宁. 半监督最小二乘支持向量机的研究及其在海上油田储层预测中的应用[J]. 应用地球物理, 2016, 13(2): 406-415.
[5] 王康宁, 孙赞东, 董宁. 基于各向异性MRF-MAP的叠前反演及在页岩气甜点识别中的应用[J]. 应用地球物理, 2015, 12(4): 533-544.
[6] 张如伟, 李洪奇, 张宝金, 黄捍东, 文鹏飞. 基于叠前地震AVA反演的天然气水合物沉积物识别[J]. 应用地球物理, 2015, 12(3): 453-464.
[7] 朱超, 郭庆新, 宫清顺, 刘占国, 李森明, 黄革萍. 基于Xu-White模型的致密储层叠前正演模拟研究与应用[J]. 应用地球物理, 2015, 12(3): 421-431.
[8] 黄捍东, 王彦超, 郭飞, 张生, 纪永祯, 刘承汉. 基于Zoeppritz方程的叠前地震反演方法研究及其在流体识别中的应用[J]. 应用地球物理, 2015, 12(2): 199-211.
[9] 骆春妹, 王尚旭, 袁三一. 子波相位不准对叠前波形反演的影响[J]. 应用地球物理, 2014, 11(4): 479-488.
[10] 田玉昆, 周辉, 陈汉明, 邹雅铭, 关守军. Huber-Markov随机场自适应边缘保护贝叶斯地震资料叠前反演[J]. 应用地球物理, 2013, 10(4): 453-460.
[11] 麻纪强, 耿建华. 基于Cauchy先验分布的AVO弹性参数弱非线性波形反演[J]. 应用地球物理, 2013, 10(4): 442-452.
[12] 黄捍东, 张如伟, 慎国强, 郭飞, 汪佳蓓. 叠前弹性参数一致性反演方法研究[J]. 应用地球物理, 2011, 8(4): 311-318.
[13] 贺芙邦, 游俊, 陈开远. 基于岩石物理分析的叠前弹性反演预测含气砂岩分布[J]. 应用地球物理, 2011, 8(3): 197-205.
[14] 裴发根, 邹长春, 何涛, 史謌, 仇根根, 任科英. 中低孔渗储层岩石弹性参数的流体敏感性研究[J]. 应用地球物理, 2010, 7(1): 1-9.
[15] 裴发根, 邹长春, 何涛, 史謌, 仇根根, 任科英. 中低孔渗储层岩石弹性参数的流体敏感性研究[J]. 应用地球物理, 2010, 6(1): 1-9.
版权所有 © 2011 应用地球物理
技术支持 北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司