APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
 
        Home  |  Copyright  |  About Journal  |  Editorial Board  |  Indexed-in  |  Subscriptions  |  Download  |  Contacts Us  |  中文
APPLIED GEOPHYSICS  2020, Vol. 17 Issue (4): 489-500    DOI: 10.1007/s11770-020-0841-7
article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
Correction of seismic attribute-based smallstructure prediction errors using GPR data—a case study of the Shuguang Coal Mine, Shanxi*
Cui Fan 1,2,3, Zhao Zhi-Rong 1, Du Yun-Fei 1, Bai Yu 4, Xu Chang-Qing 5, and Jia Xiao-Feng 5
1. College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, CUMTB, Beijing 100083, China.
2. State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, CUMTB, Beijing 100083, China.
3. Beijing Key Laboratory for Precise Mining of Intergrown Energy and Resources, Beijing 100083, China.
4. Beijing YuBo Innovation Geophysics Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing 100083, China.
5. Shuguang Mine, Shanxi Fenxi Mining (Group) Co., Ltd., Jiexiu 032000, China.
 Download: PDF (1268 KB)   HTML ( KB)   Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Small structures in coal mine working face is one of the main hidden dangers of safe and efficient production in coal mine. Currently, seismic exploration is often used as the main method for detecting such structures. However, limited by the accuracy of seismic data processing and interpretation, the interpreted location of small structures is often deviated. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) can detect small structures accurately, but the exploration depth is shallow. The combination of the two methods can improve the exploration accuracy of small structures in coal mine. Aiming at the 1226# working face of Shuguang coal mine, we propose a method of seismic-attributes based small-structure prediction error correction using GPR data. First, we extract the coherence, curvature, and dip attributes from seismic data, that are sensitive to small structures, then by considering factors such as the effective detection range of GPR and detection environment, we select two structures from the prediction results of seismic attributes for GPR detection. Finally, based on the relationship between the positions of small structures predicted by the two methods, we use statistical methods to determine the overall off set distance and azimuth of the small structures in the entire study area and use the results as a standard for correcting each structure position. The results show that the GPR data can be used to correct the horizontal position errors of small structures predicted by seismic attribute analysis. The accuracy of the prediction results is greatly improved, with the error controlled within 5 m and reduced by more than 80%. Therefore, the feasibility of the method proposed in this study is verified.
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Key wordsGPR   seismic attribute analysis   structure interpretation   off set correction     
Received: 2020-03-09;
Corresponding Authors: Cui Fan (Email: cuifan@cumtb.edu.cn).    
 E-mail: cuifan@cumtb.edu.cn
About author: Cui Fan, PhD, associate professor, he graduated from the Anhui University of Science and Technology with a bachelor’s degree in Resource Management in 2006, from the China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing, with a master’s degree in Earth Exploration and Information Technology in 2009, and from the China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing, with a doctorate degree in Earth Exploration and Information Technology in 2012. His research interests include applications of ground penetration, geophysical methods for electromagnetic applications and geophysics for coal fields. Email: cuifan@cumtb.edu.cn
Cite this article:   
. Correction of seismic attribute-based smallstructure prediction errors using GPR data—a case study of the Shuguang Coal Mine, Shanxi*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 17(4): 489-500.
 
No references of article
[1] Lv Yu-zeng, Wang Hong-hua, Gong Jun-bo. Application of GPR reverse time migration in tunnel lining cavity imaging*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 17(2): 277-284.
[2] Feng De-Shan , Zhang Hua , and Wang Xun . Second-generation wavelet fi nite element based on the lifting scheme for GPR simulation*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 17(1): 143-153.
[3] Cui Fan , Li Shuai, Yuan Jiong-Xuan, Bai Jie-Bin , Zhao Yu-Xuan, and Zhou Ying-Ging. GPR based RTM imaging technology for estimating rhizome diameters and application in the western China mining area*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 17(1): 154-166.
[4] Zhu Xiao-San, Lu Min-Jie. Regional metallogenic structure based on aeromagnetic data in northern Chile[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(4): 721-735.
[5] Zeng Zhao-Fa, Chen Xiong, Li Jing, Chen Ling-Na, Lu Qi, Liu Feng-Shan. Recursive impedance inversion of ground-penetrating radar data in stochastic media[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2015, 12(4): 615-625.
[6] ZHAO Wen-Ke, TIAN Gang, WANG Bang-Bing, SHI Zhan-Jie, LIN Jin-Xin. Application of 3D GPR attribute technology in archaeological investigations[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2012, 9(3): 261-269.
[7] ZENG Zhao-Fa, WU Feng-Shou, HUANG Ling, LIU Feng-Shan, SUN Ji-Guang. The adaptive chirplet transform and its application in GPR target detection[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2009, 6(2): 192-200.
[8] Feng De-Shan, Zhang Hua, Wang Xun. Second-generation wavelet finite element based on the lifting scheme for GPR simulation[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 0, (): 710-715.
Copyright © 2011 APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
Support by Beijing Magtech Co.ltd support@magtech.com.cn