APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
 
        Home  |  Copyright  |  About Journal  |  Editorial Board  |  Indexed-in  |  Subscriptions  |  Download  |  Contacts Us  |  中文
APPLIED GEOPHYSICS  2019, Vol. 16 Issue (2): 161-172    DOI: 10.1007/s11770-019-0760-7
article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
Magnetotelluric signal-noise separation method based on SVM–CEEMDWT
Li Jin, Cai Jin, Tang Jing-Tian, Li Guang, Zhang Xian, and Xu Zhi-Min
1.Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Computing and Language Information Processing, College of Information Science and Engineering, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
2.School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Key Laboratory of Metallogenic Prediction of Non-Ferrous Metals and Geological Environment Monitor, Ministry of Education, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
3.State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Nuclear Resources and Environment, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China.
 Download: PDF (1467 KB)   HTML ( KB)   Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract To better retain useful weak low-frequency magnetotelluric (MT) signals with strong interference during MT data processing, we propose a SVM–CEEMDWT based MT data signal-noise separation method, which extracts the weak MT signal affected by strong interference. First, the approximate entropy, fuzzy entropy, sample entropy, and Lempel–Ziv (LZ) complexity are extracted from the magnetotelluric data. Then, four robust parameters are used as the inputs to the support vector machine (SVM) to train the sample library and build a model based on the different complexity of signals. Based on this model, we can only consider time series with strong interference when using the complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition (CEEMD) and wavelet threshold (WT) for noise suppression. Simulation results suggest that the SVM based on the robust parameters can distinguish the time periods with strong interference well before noise suppression. Compared with the CEEMDWT, the proposed SVM–CEEMDWT method retains more low-frequency low-variability information, and the apparent resistivity curve is smoother and more continuous. Moreover, the results better reflect the deep electrical structure in the field.
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Key wordsSVM–CEEMDWT   magnetotelluric   signal-noise separation   MT data processing     
Received: 2018-09-25;
Fund:

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFC0603202), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.41404111), Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (No.2018JJ2258) and Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Project Foundation (No. 2018TP1018).

Corresponding Authors: Li Jin (Email: geologylj@163.com)   
 E-mail: Email: geologylj@163.com
About author: Li Jin, Doctor, Associate Professor, he received his Bachelor’s degree and Master’s degree from Hunan Normal University in 2003 and 2006, respectively. In 2012, he received a Doctor’s degree in Earth Exploration & Information Technology from Central South University. He is interested in magnetotelluric noise suppression and signal-noise identification. Email: geologylj@163.com
Cite this article:   
. Magnetotelluric signal-noise separation method based on SVM–CEEMDWT[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 16(2): 161-172.
 
No references of article
[1] Huang Xian-Yang, Deng Ju-Zhi, Chen Xiao, Wang Xian-Xiang, Chen Hui, and Yu Hui. Magnetotelluric extremum boundary inversion based on different stabilizers and its application in a high radioactive waste repository site selection*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 16(3): 367-377.
[2] Cao Xiao-Yue, Yin Chang-Chun, Zhang Bo, Huang Xin, Liu Yun-He, and Cai Jing. 3D magnetotelluric inversions with unstructured finite-element and limited-memory quasi-Newton methods[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(3-4): 556-565.
[3] Wang Tao, Wang Kun-Peng, Tan Han-Dong. Forward modeling and inversion of tensor CSAMT in 3D anisotropic media[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(4): 590-605.
[4] Wang Kun-Peng, Tan Han-Dong, Wang Tao. 2D joint inversion of CSAMT and magnetic data based on cross-gradient theory[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(2): 279-290.
[5] Li Jun-Jie, Yan Jia-Bin, Huang Xiang-Yu. Precision of meshfree methods and application to forward modeling of two-dimensional electromagnetic sources[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2015, 12(4): 503-515.
[6] Hu Ying-Cai, Li Tong-Lin, Fan Cui-Song, Wang Da-Yong, Li Jian-Ping. Three-dimensional tensor controlled-source electromagnetic modeling based on the vector finite-element method[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2015, 12(1): 35-46.
[7] LIN Chang-Hong, TAN Han-Dong, SHU Qing, TONG Tuo, ZHANG Yu-Mei. Three-dimensional interpretation of sparse survey line MT data: Synthetic examples*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2012, 9(1): 9-18.
[8] Shireesha M. and Harinarayana T.. Processing of magnetotelluric data - a comparative study with 4 and 6 element impedance tensor elements[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2011, 8(4): 285-292.
[9] LIN Chang-Hong, TAN Han-Dong, TONG Tuo. Three-dimensional conjugate gradient inversion of magnetotelluric full information data[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2011, 8(1): 1-10.
[10] LIN Chang-Hong, TAN Han-Dong, TONG Tuo. Parallel rapid relaxation inversion of 3D magnetotelluric data[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2009, 6(1): 77-83.
Copyright © 2011 APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
Support by Beijing Magtech Co.ltd support@magtech.com.cn