APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
 
        Home  |  Copyright  |  About Journal  |  Editorial Board  |  Indexed-in  |  Subscriptions  |  Download  |  Contacts Us  |  中文
APPLIED GEOPHYSICS  2016, Vol. 13 Issue (2): 375-381    DOI: 10.1007/s11770-016-0550-4
article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
Digital core based transmitted ultrasonic wave simulation and velocity accuracy analysis
Zhu Wei1 and Shan Rui2
1. Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources (Yangtze University), Ministry of Education; Geophysics and Oil Resource Institute, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China.
2. CCTEG Xi’an Research Institute, Xi’an 710077, China.
 Download: PDF (591 KB)   HTML ( KB)   Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Transmitted ultrasonic wave simulation (TUWS) in a digital core is one of the important elements of digital rock physics and is used to study wave propagation in porous cores and calculate equivalent velocity. When simulating wave propagates in a 3D digital core, two additional layers are attached to its two surfaces vertical to the wave-direction and one planar wave source and two receiver-arrays are properly installed. After source excitation, the two receivers then record incident and transmitted waves of the digital rock. Wave propagating velocity, which is the velocity of the digital core, is computed by the picked peak-time difference between the two recorded waves. To evaluate the accuracy of TUWS, a digital core is fully saturated with gas, oil, and water to calculate the corresponding velocities. The velocities increase with decreasing wave frequencies in the simulation frequency band, and this is considered to be the result of scattering. When the pore fluids are varied from gas to oil and finally to water, the velocity-variation characteristics between the different frequencies are similar, thereby approximately following the variation law of velocities obtained from linear elastic statics simulation (LESS), although their absolute values are different. However, LESS has been widely used. The results of this paper show that the transmission ultrasonic simulation has high relative precision.
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Key wordsdigital rock   transmitted ultrasonic wave simulation   velocity, relative precision     
Received: 2015-07-01;
Fund:

This work was supported by the Open Fund of the Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources (Yangtze University), the Ministry of Education (No. K2014-06), and the Reservoir Geophysical Research Center at Yangtze University.

Cite this article:   
. Digital core based transmitted ultrasonic wave simulation and velocity accuracy analysis[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(2): 375-381.
 
[1] Liu, X. F., 2010, Numerical simulation of elastic and electrical properties of rock based on digital cores: PhD Thesis, China University of Petroleum (East China), Dongying.
[2] Andrä, H., Combaret, N., Dvorkin, J., et al., 2013, Digital Rock Physics Benchmarks-Part II: Computing effective properties: Computers & Geosciences, 50(SI), 33−43.
[3] Liu, X., Sun, J., and Wang, H., 2009, Numerical simulation of rock electrical properties based on digital cores: Applied Geophysics, 6(1), 1−7.
[4] Arns, C. H., Knackstedt, M. A., Pinczewski, W. V., et al., 2002, Computation of linear elastic properties from micro-tomographic images: Methodology and agreement between theory and experiment: Geophysics, 67(5), 1396−1405.
[5] Knackstedt, M. A., Arns, C. H., Pinczewski, W. V., et al., 2003, Velocity-porosity relationships,1:accurate velocity model for clean consolidated sandstones: Geophysics, 68(3), 1822−1831.
[6] Liu, X. F., 2010, Numerical simulation of elastic and electrical properties of rock based on digital cores: PhD Thesis, China University of Petroleum (East China), Dongying.
[7] Madonna, C., Almqvist, B. S. G., and Saenger, E. H., 2012, Digital rock physics: numerical prediction of pressure-dependent ultrasonic velocities using micro-CT imaging: Geophysical Journal International, 189(3), 1475−1482.
[8] Liu, X., Sun, J., and Wang, H., 2009, Numerical simulation of rock electrical properties based on digital cores: Applied Geophysics, 6(1), 1−7.
[9] Mavko, G., Mukerji. T., and Dvorkin, J., 2009, The Rock Physics Handbook-Tools for Seismic Analysis in Porous Media: Cambridge University Press, New York, 150−155.
[10] Madonna, C., Almqvist, B. S. G., and Saenger, E. H., 2012, Digital rock physics: numerical prediction of pressure-dependent ultrasonic velocities using micro-CT imaging: Geophysical Journal International, 189(3), 1475−1482.
[11] Saenger, E. H., 2004, Numerical considerations of fluid effects on wave propagation: Influence of the tortuosity: Geophysical Research Letters, 31, L21613.
[12] Mavko, G., Mukerji. T., and Dvorkin, J., 2009, The Rock Physics Handbook-Tools for Seismic Analysis in Porous Media: Cambridge University Press, New York, 150−155.
[13] Saenger, E. H., 2008, Numerical methods to determine effective elastic properties: International Journal of Engineering Science, 46(6), 598−605.
[14] Saenger, E. H., 2004, Numerical considerations of fluid effects on wave propagation: Influence of the tortuosity: Geophysical Research Letters, 31, L21613.
[15] Saenger, E. H., Ciz, R., Krüger, O. S., et al., 2007, Finite-difference modeling of wave propagation on microscale: A snapshot of the work in progress: Geophysics, 72(5), SM293−SM300.
[16] Saenger, E. H., 2008, Numerical methods to determine effective elastic properties: International Journal of Engineering Science, 46(6), 598−605.
[17] Saenger, E. H., Enzmann, F., Keehm, Y., et al., 2011, Digital rock physics: Effect of fluid viscosity on effective elastic properties: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 74(4), 236-241.
[18] Saenger, E. H., Ciz, R., Krüger, O. S., et al., 2007, Finite-difference modeling of wave propagation on microscale: A snapshot of the work in progress: Geophysics, 72(5), SM293−SM300.
[19] Saenger, E. H., Gold, N., and Shapiro, S. A., 2000, Modeling the propagation of elastic waves using a modified finite difference grid: Wave Motion, 31(1), 77−92.
[20] Saenger, E. H., Enzmann, F., Keehm, Y., et al., 2011, Digital rock physics: Effect of fluid viscosity on effective elastic properties: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 74(4), 236-241.
[21] Saenger, E. H., Shapiro, S. A., and Keehm, Y., 2005, Seismic effects of viscous Biot-coupling: Finite difference simulations on micro-scale: Geophysical Research Letters, 32, L14310.
[22] Sun, J. M., Yan, G. L., Jiang, L. M., et al., 2014, Research of influence laws of fluid properties on elastic parameters of fractured low permeability reservoir rocks based on digital core: Journal of China University of Petroleum (In Chinese), 38(3), 39-44.
[23] Wang, S., Liu, X. J., Chen, Q., et al., 2015, Carbonate reservoir porosity ultrasonic evaluation by numerical simulation:Progress in Geophysics (In Chinese), 30(1), 267−273.
[24] Zhang, Y., Song, L. M., Deffenbaugh, M., and Toksöz, M. N., 2010, A finite difference method for a coupled model of wave propagation in poroelastic materials: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(5), 2847−2855.
[25] Zhao, J. P., Sun, J. M., Jiang, L. M., et al., 2014, Effects of cementation on elastic property and permeability of reservoir rocks: Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences (In Chinese), 39(6), 769-774.
[26] Zhu, W., and Shan, R., 2014, Progress of digital rock physics: Oil Geophysical Prospecting (In Chinese), 49(6), 1138−1146.
[27] Saenger, E. H., Gold, N., and Shapiro, S. A., 2000, Modeling the propagation of elastic waves using a modified finite difference grid: Wave Motion, 31(1), 77−92.
[28] Saenger, E. H., Shapiro, S. A., and Keehm, Y., 2005, Seismic effects of viscous Biot-coupling: Finite difference simulations on micro-scale: Geophysical Research Letters, 32, L14310.
[29] Sun, J. M., Yan, G. L., Jiang, L. M., et al., 2014, Research of influence laws of fluid properties on elastic parameters of fractured low permeability reservoir rocks based on digital core: Journal of China University of Petroleum (In Chinese), 38(3), 39-44.
[30] Wang, S., Liu, X. J., Chen, Q., et al., 2015, Carbonate reservoir porosity ultrasonic evaluation by numerical simulation:Progress in Geophysics (In Chinese), 30(1), 267−273.
[31] Zhang, Y., Song, L. M., Deffenbaugh, M., and Toksöz, M. N., 2010, A finite difference method for a coupled model of wave propagation in poroelastic materials: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(5), 2847−2855.
[32] Zhao, J. P., Sun, J. M., Jiang, L. M., et al., 2014, Effects of cementation on elastic property and permeability of reservoir rocks: Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences (In Chinese), 39(6), 769-774.
[33] Zhu, W., and Shan, R., 2014, Progress of digital rock physics: Oil Geophysical Prospecting (In Chinese), 49(6), 1138−1146.
[1] Duan Xi and Liu Xiang-Jun. Two-phase pore-fluid distribution in fractured media: acoustic wave velocity vs saturation[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(2): 311-317.
[2] Guo Gui-Hong, Yan Jian-Ping, Zhang Zhi, José Badal, Cheng Jian-Wu, Shi Shuang-Hu, and Ma Ya-Wei. Numerical analysis of seismic wave propagation in fluid-saturated porous multifractured media[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(2): 311-317.
[3] Sun Cheng-Yu, Wang Yan-Yan, Wu Dun-Shi, Qin Xiao-Jun. Nonlinear Rayleigh wave inversion based on the shuffled frog-leaping algorithm[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(4): 551-558.
[4] Li Lin, Ma Jin-Feng, Wang Hao-Fan, Tan Ming-You, Cui Shi-Ling, Zhang Yun-Yin, Qu Zhi-Peng. Shear wave velocity prediction during CO2-EOR and sequestration in the Gao89 well block of the Shengli Oilfield[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(3): 372-380.
[5] Song Lian-Teng, Liu Zhong-Hua, Zhou Can-Can, Yu Jun, Xiu Li-Jun, Sun Zhong-Chun, Zhang Hai-Tao. Analysis of elastic anisotropy of tight sandstone and the influential factors[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(1): 10-20.
[6] Liu Jie, Liu Jiang-Ping, Cheng Fei, Wang Jing, Liu Xiao-Xiao. Rock-physics models of hydrate-bearing sediments in permafrost, Qilian Mountains, China[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(1): 31-39.
[7] Guo Tong-Cui, Wang Hong-Jun, Mu Long-Xin, Zhang Xing-Yang, Ma Zhi, Tian Yu, Li Hao-Chen. A graphical model for haloanhydrite components and P-wave velocity: A case study of halo-anhydrites in Amu Darya Basin[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(3): 459-468.
[8] . Seismic dynamic monitoring in CO2 flooding based on characterization of frequency-dependent velocity factor[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(2): 307-314.
[9] Zhang Wen-Hui, Fu Li-Yun, Zhang Yan, Jin Wei-Jun. Computation of elastic properties of 3D digital cores from the Longmaxi shale[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(2): 364-374.
[10] Chen Hai-Feng, Li Xiang-Yang, Qian Zhong-Ping, Song Jian-Jun, Zhao Gui-Ling. Prestack migration velocity analysis based on simplified two-parameter moveout equation[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(1): 135-144.
[11] Liu Shao-Yong, Wang Hua-Zhong, Liu Tai-Chen, Hu Ying, Zhang Cai. Kirchhoff PSDM angle-gather generation based on the traveltime gradient[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2015, 12(1): 64-72.
[12] LING Yun, HAN Li-Guo, ZHANG Yi-Ming. Viscoelastic characteristics of low-frequency seismic wave attenuation in porous media[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2014, 11(4): 355-363.
[13] ZHOU Teng-Fei, PENG Geng-Xin, HU Tian-Yue, DUAN Wen-Sheng, YAO Feng-Chang, LIU Yi-Mou. Rayleigh wave nonlinear inversion based on the Firefly algorithm[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2014, 11(2): 167-178.
[14] HAN Jian-Guang, WANG Bin, HAN Ning, XING Zhan-Tao, LU Jun. Multiwave velocity analysis based on Gaussian beam prestack depth migration[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2014, 11(2): 186-196.
[15] YU Hao, BA Jing, Carcione Jose, LI Jin-Song, TANG Gang, ZHANG Xing-Yang, HE Xin-Zhen, 欧Yang-Hua . Rock physics modeling of heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs: porosity estimation and hydrocarbon detection[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2014, 11(1): 9-22.
Copyright © 2011 APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
Support by Beijing Magtech Co.ltd support@magtech.com.cn