Meng Qing-Xin1,2, Hu Xiang-Yun1, Pan He-Ping1, and Zhou Feng1
1. Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China.
2. College of Exploration Technology and Engineering, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China.
Abstract：
We calculate the multicomponent responses of surface-hole transient electromagnetic method. The methods and models are unsuitable as geoelectric models of conductive surrounding rocks because they are based on regular local targets. We also propose a calculation and analysis scheme based on numerical simulations of the subsurface transient electromagnetic fields. In the modeling of the electromagnetic fields, the forward modeling simulations are performed by using the finite-difference time-domain method and the discrete image method, which combines the Gaver–Stehfest inverse Laplace transform with the Prony method to solve the initial electromagnetic fields. The precision in the iterative computations is ensured by using the transmission boundary conditions. For the response analysis, we customize geoelectric models consisting of near-borehole targets and conductive wall rocks and implement forward modeling simulations. The observed electric fields are converted into induced electromotive force responses using multicomponent observation devices. By comparing the transient electric fields and multicomponent responses under different conditions, we suggest that the multicomponent-induced electromotive force responses are related to the horizontal and vertical gradient variations of the transient electric field at different times. The characteristics of the response are determined by the varying the subsurface transient electromagnetic fields, i.e., diffusion, attenuation and distortion, under different conditions as well as the electromagnetic fields at the observation positions. The calculation and analysis scheme of the response consider the surrounding rocks and the anomalous field of the local targets. It therefore can account for the geological data better than conventional transient field response analysis of local targets.
Adhidjaja, J. I., and Hohmann, G. W., 1989, A finite-difference algorithm for the transient electromagnetic response of a three-dimensional body: Geophysical Journal International, 98(2), 233−242.
[2]
Annetts, D., 2012, Inversion of surface and downhole electromagnetic data for a 3D earth: 22nd ASEG Geophysical Conference, Extended Abstracts, 1−3.
[3]
Buselli, G., and Lee, S. K., 1996, Modelling of drill-hole TEM responses from multiple targets covered by a conductive overburden: Exploration Geophysics, 27(3), 141−153.
[4]
Dyck, A. V., 1984, The role of simple computer models in interpretation of wide-band, drill-hole electromagnetic surveys in mineral exploration: Geophysics, 49(7), 957−980.
[5]
Dyck, A. V., 1991, Drill-Hole Electromagnetic Methods, in Nabighian, M. N., Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 881−930.
[6]
Ge, Y. H., and Esselle, K. P., 2002, New closed-form Green’s functions for microstrip structure Theory and results: IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 50(6), 1556−1560.
[7]
Guo, J. L., Zeng, Y. Q., and Li, X., 2015, Numerical simulation analysis of surface-to-borehole TEM based on the finite difference method: International Workshop and Gravity, Electrical & Magnetic Methods and their Applications, 115−118.
[8]
Guptasarma, D., and Singh, B., 1997, New digital linear filters for Hankel J(0) and J(1) transforms: Geophysical Prospecting, 45(5), 745−762.
[9]
Jeffrey, A., and Zwillinger, D., 2007, Table of integrals, series, and products: Academic press, New York.
[10]
Jiang, B. Y., 1998, Applied Near Zone Magnetic Source Transient Electromagnetic Exploration: Geological Publishing House, Beijing.
[11]
Johnson, D., Furse, C., and Tripp, A. C., 1998, FDTD modeling of the borehole EM response of a Conductive Ore deposit in a Lossy Dielectric: 68th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 794−796.
[12]
Li, J. H., Liu, S. C., Jiao, X. F., et al., 2015, Three-dimensional forward modeling for surface-borehole transient electromagnetic method: Oil geophysical prospecting, 50(3), 556−564.
[13]
Li, X., 2002, The Theory and Application of Transient Electromagnetic Sounding: Shanxi Science Technology Press, Xi’an.
[14]
Liao, Z. P., 2001, Transmitting boundary and radiation conditions at infinity: China Science E, 2001, 31(3), 254−262.
[15]
Liu, G. M., and Asten, M. W., 1993, Fast approximate solutions of transient EM response to a target buried beneath a conductive overburden: Geophysics, 58(6), 810−817.
[16]
McNeill, J. D., 1980, Applications of transient electromagnetic techniques: Technical Note TN-, Geonics Limited, Toronto.
[17]
McNeill, J. D., 1982, Interpretation of large-loop transmitter transient electromagnetic surveys: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1982, 373−374.
[18]
Oristaglio, M. D., 1982, Diffusion of electromagnetic fields into the earth from a line source of current: Geophysics, 47(11), 1585−1592.
[19]
Qian, W., West, G., Hughes, N., and Ravenhurst, W., 2002, EM modeling of a plate conductor revisited: 72th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1097−1100.
[20]
Shao, Z. H., Hong, W., and Zhou, J. Y., 2000, The unified theories on transmitting boundary conditions: China Science E, 30(1), 64-69.
[21]
Swidinsky, A., and Nabighian, M., 2015, On smoke rings produced by a loop buried in a conductive half-space: Geophysics, 80(4), E225−E236.
[22]
Walker, P. W., and West, G. F., 1991, A robust integral equation solution for electromagnetic scattering by a thin plate in conductive media: Geophysics, 56(8), 1140−1152.
[23]
West, R. C., and Ward, S. H., 1998, The borehole transient EM of the three-dimensional fractured zone in a conductive half space: Geophysics, 53(11), 1469−1487.
[24]
Yuan, M. T., and Sarkar, T. K., 2006, A direct discrete complex image method from the closed-form Green’s functions in multilayered media: IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 54(3), 1025−1032.
[25]
Zhdanov, M. S., 2009, Geophysical Electromagnetic Theory and Methods: Elsevier Science and Technology, Oxford.
2017, Vol. 14 
