Abstract：
We modeled and studied the permeability of methane hydrate bearing formations as a function of methane hydrate concentration by artificially varying the T2 distribution as well as using a tube-sphere model. We varied the proportion of irreducible and movable water as well as the total porosity associated with the T2 distribution and found the normalized permeability as a function of methane hydrate concentration is dependent of these variations. Using a tube-sphere model, we increased the methane hydrate concentration by randomly placing methane hydrate crystals in the pore spaces and computed the permeability using either the Schlumberger T2 relaxation time formula or a direct calculation based on Darcy’s law assuming Poiseuille flow. Earlier experimental measurements reported in the literature show there is a methane hydrate concentration range where the permeability remains relatively constant. We found that when the Schlumberger T2 relaxation time formula is used the simulation results show a curve of normalized permeability versus methane hydrate concentration quite close to that predicted by the Masuda model with N = 15. When the permeability was directly calculated based on Darcy’s law, the simulation results show a much higher normalized permeability and only show a trend consistent with the experimental results, i.e., with a permeability plateau, when the methane hydrate crystals are preferentially placed in the tubes, and the higher the preferential probability, the larger the range where the permeability has a plateau.
ZHAO Qian,DENG Ke-Jun,LIU Xue-Wei. A simulation study of formation permeability as a function of methane hydrate concentration*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2011, 8(2): 101-109.
[1]
Brewer, P. G., Orr, F. M. Jr., Friederich, G., Kvenvolden, D.L. McFarlane, Q. J., and Kirkwood, W., 1997, Deep ocean field tests of methane hydrate formation from a remotely operated vehicle: Geology, 25, 407 - 410.
[2]
Clennell, M. B., Hovland, M., Booth, J. S., Henry, P., and Winters, W. J., 1999, Formation of natural gas hydrates in marine sediments, 1. Conceptual model of gas hydrate growth conditioned by host sediment properties: J. Geophys. Res., 104(B10), 22985 - 23003.
[3]
Handa, Y. P., and Stupin, D., 1992, Thermodynamic properties and dissociation characteristics of methane and propane hydrates in 70-A-radius silica-gel pores: J. Phys. Chem., 96, 8599 - 8603.
[4]
Helgerud, M. B., 2001, Wave speeds in gas hydrate and sediments containing gas hydrate: A laboratory and modeling study: Thesis, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
[5]
Henry, P., Thomas, M., and Clennell, M. B., 1999, Formation of natural gas hydrates in marine sediments, 2. Thermodynamic calculations of stability conditions in porous sediments: J. Geophys. Res., 104(B10), 23005 - 23022.
[6]
Kenyon, W. E., 1992, Nuclear magnetic resonance as a petrophysical measurement: Nucl. Geophys., 6, 153 - 171.
[7]
Kleinberg, R. L., Flaum, C., Griffin, D. D., Brewer, P.G. Malby, G. E. Peltzer, E. T., and Yesinowski, J. P., 2003a, Deep sea NMR: methane hydrate growth habit in porous media and its relationship to hydraulic permeability, deposit accumulation and submarine slope stability: J. Geophys. Res., 108(B10), 2508 - 2524.
[8]
Kleinberg, R. L., Flaum, C., Straley, Brewer, P. G., Malby, G. E., Peltzer, E. T., Friederich, G., and Yesinowski, J. P., 2003b, Seafloor nuclear magnetic resonance assay of methane hydrate in sediment and rock: J. Geophys. Res., 108(B10), 2137 - 2149.
[9]
Masuda, Y., Naganawa, S., Ando, S., and Sato, K., 1997, Numerical calculation of gas production performance from reservoirs containing natural gas hydrates: Paper 38291 presented at the Annual Technical Conference, Soc. of Petrol. Eng., San Antonio, Tex.
[10]
Melnikov, V., and Nesterov, A., 1996, Modeling of gas hydrates formation in porous media: Second International Conference on Natural gas hydrates, United Engineering Foundation, Toulouse, France.
[11]
Minagawa, H., Nishikawa, Y., Ikeda, I., Miyazaki, K., Takahara, N., Sakamoto, Y., Komai, T., and Narita, H., 2008, Relation between permeability and pore size distribution of methane hydrate bearing sediments: Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, Paper 19305.
[12]
Nimblett, J., and Ruppel, C., 2003, Permeability evolution during the formation of gas hydrates in marine sediments: J. Geophys. Res., 108(B9), 2420 - 2416.
[13]
Straley, C., Rossini, D., Vinegar, H., Tutunjian, P., and Morriss, C., 1994, Core analysis by low field NMR: Paper SCA - 9094 presented at the 1994 International Symposium, Soc. of Core Anal., Stavanger, Norway.
[14]
Tohidi, B., Anderson, R., Clennell, M. B., Burgass, R.W., and Biderkab, A.B., 2001, Visual observation of gas hydrate formation and dissociation in synthetic porous media by means of glass micromodels: Geology, 29, 867 - 870.
2011, Vol. 8 
|
