APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
 
        Home  |  Copyright  |  About Journal  |  Editorial Board  |  Indexed-in  |  Subscriptions  |  Download  |  Contacts Us  |  中文
APPLIED GEOPHYSICS  2025, Vol. 22 Issue (4): 1169-1181    DOI: 10.1007/ s11770-025-1304-y
article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
Comparative Analysis of Seismic Observation Capabilities between Quantum Absolute Gravimeter and gPhone RG at the Same Site
Liu Zhong-Tao, Liu Dai-qin*, Ren Jia, Zhao Zhi-Yuan
1. Hebei Hongshan National Observatory on Thick Sediments and Seismic Hazards, Xingtai 055350, China 2. Zhangjiakou earthquake monitoring center station, Zhangjiakou 075000, China 3. Seismological Bureau of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830011, China 4. Hebei Provincial Seismological Bureau, Shijiazhuang 050022, China
 Download: PDF (0 KB)   HTML ( KB)   Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract This study compares the performance of a quantum absolute gravimeter (QAG) and a gPhone relative gravimeter (RG) installed at the same site in Zhangjiakou. The comparison focuses on their capabilities in recording seismic waveforms and detecting Earth's free oscillation signals following the Myanmar Ms7.9 earthquake. Both instruments exhibit unique advantages in their observation capabilities. The QAG demonstrates high sensitivity to the initial arrival of seismic waves, producing distinct peak waveforms, while the RG maintains a stable waveform suitable for analyzing seismic wave propagation and energy dissipation mechanisms. In terms of time-frequency analysis, the QAG excels in surface wave frequency resolution but experiences rapid signal attenuation. Conversely, the RG offers superior stability in sustained gravity disturbances with slower signal decay. Regarding spherical Earth free oscillation signals, the RG generally detects more pronounced signals with minimal deviation from the Preliminary Reference Earth Model (PREM) theoretical values. However, the QAG exhibits high sensitivity and a wide dynamic range in higher frequency bands. Combining data from both instruments provides comprehensive seismic monitoring data, facilitating a deeper understanding of Earth's internal mass distribution and dynamic processes.
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Key wordsSame site    Gravimeter    Myanmar earthquake    Time-frequency analysis    Free oscillation of the Earth     
Received: 2025-05-20;
Fund: The investigation is financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.42274014, 42574075); Tianshan Talent Science and Technology Innovation Team of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (No.2024TSYCTD0014); Key Research and Development Program of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (No.2020B03006-2,2024B03018-3); The Third Scientific Expedition to Xinjiang (No.2022XJKK1305); Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (No.2022D01A106, 2023D01A105); Hebei Earthquake Science and Technology Spark Program Project (No.DZ2025082000001).
Corresponding Authors: 刘代芹 (Email:xjdzjldq@ 126.com).   
 E-mail: xjdzjldq@ 126.com
About author: Liu Zhongtao, born in 1990, holds a Master's degree an discurrently work in gasan Engineer. His primary research focuses on geodesy, gravity measurements, and crustal deformation studies.E-mail: 452735953@qq.com
Cite this article:   
. Comparative Analysis of Seismic Observation Capabilities between Quantum Absolute Gravimeter and gPhone RG at the Same Site[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2025, 22(4): 1169-1181.
 
No references of article
[1] Lei Yang, Liu Lu, Bai Wen-lei, Feng Hai-xin, Wang Zhi-yang*. Seismic Signal Analysis Based on Adaptive Variational Mode Decomposition for High-speed Rail Seismic Waves[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2024, 21(2): 358-371.
[2] Qiang Jian-Ke, Lu Kai, Zhang Qian-Jiang, Man Kai-Feng, Li Jun-Ying, Mao Xian-Cheng, Lai Jian-Qing. Frequency characteristics and far-field effect of gravity perturbation before earthquake[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(1): 1-9.
[3] Du Zheng-Cong, Xu De-Ping, Zhang Jin-Ming. Fractional S-transform?part 2: Application to reservoir prediction and fluid identification[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(2): 343-352.
[4] WANG Xiong-Wen, WANG Hua-Zhong. Application of sparse time-frequency decomposition to seismic data[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2014, 11(4): 447-458.
[5] CHEN Shuang-Quan, LI Xiang-Yang, WANG Shang-Xu. The analysis of frequency-dependent characteristics for fluid detection: a physical model experiment*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2012, 9(2): 195-206.
[6] XU De-Ping, GUO Ke. Fractional S transform – Part 1: Theory*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2012, 9(1): 73-79.
[7] XIONG Xiao-Jun, HE Xi-Lei, PU Yong, HE Zhen-Hua, LIN Kai. High-precision frequency attenuation analysis and its application[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2011, 8(4): 337-343.
Copyright © 2011 APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
Support by Beijing Magtech Co.ltd support@magtech.com.cn