APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
 
        Home  |  Copyright  |  About Journal  |  Editorial Board  |  Indexed-in  |  Subscriptions  |  Download  |  Contacts Us  |  中文
APPLIED GEOPHYSICS  2024, Vol. 21 Issue (4): 740-751    DOI: 10.1007/s11770-024-1107-6
article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
Suppression of seismic random noise by deep learning combined with stationary wavelet packet transform
Fan Hua, Wang Dong-Bo, Zhang Yang*, Wang Wen-Xu, and Li Tao
1.Henan Earthquake Agency, Zhengzhou 450016, China 2.China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., LTD,Beijing 100840,China 3.Engineering technology center of city seismic geological safety in Henan,Zhengzhou 450016, China
 Download: PDF (0 KB)   HTML ( KB)   Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Many traditional denoising methods, such as Gaussian filtering, tend to blur and lose details or edge information while reducing noise. The stationary wavelet packet transform is a multi-scale and multi-band analysis tool. Compared with the stationary wavelet transform, it can suppress high-frequency noise while preserving more edge details. Deep learning has signifi cantly progressed in denoising applications. DnCNN, a residual network; FFDNet, an efficient, fl exible network; U-NET, a codec network; and GAN, a generative adversative network, have better denoising effects than BM3D, the most popular conventional denoising method. Therefore, SWP_hFFDNet, a random noise attenuation network based on the stationary wavelet packet transform (SWPT) and modified FFDNet, is proposed. This network combines the advantages of SWPT, Huber norm, and FFDNet. In addition, it has three characteristics: First, SWPT is an effective featureextraction tool that can obtain low- and high-frequency features of different scales and frequency bands. Second, because the noise level map is the input of the network, the noise removal performance of different noise levels can be improved. Third, the Huber norm can reduce the sensitivity of the network to abnormal data and enhance its robustness. The network is trained using the Adam algorithm and the BSD500 dataset, which is augmented, noised, and decomposed by SWPT. Experimental and actual data processing results show that the denoising effect of the proposed method is almost the same as those of BM3D, DnCNN, and FFDNet networks for low noise. However, for high noise, the proposed method is superior to the aforementioned networks.
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Key wordsrandom noise   stationary wavelet packet transform   deep learning   noise level map   Huber norm     
Received: 2024-03-12;
Fund: This work was supported by the Henan Province Seismic Structure Exploration project (YCZC-2020-950), the Special Fund of the Chinese Central Government for Basic Scientific Research Operations in Commonweal Research Institutes (No. IGCEA2008),the Scientific and Technological Key Project of Henan Province(232102320018).
Corresponding Authors: Zhang Yang(Email:949510935@qq.com   
 E-mail: 949510935@qq.com
About author: Corresponding author: Zhang Yang, Senior Engineer,mainly researches active tectonics and basin evolutionary dynamics mechanisms.(Email: 949510935@qq.com)
Cite this article:   
. Suppression of seismic random noise by deep learning combined with stationary wavelet packet transform[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2024, 21(4): 740-751.
 
No references of article
[1] Zhang Lin, Chen Guang-dong, Ba Jing*, José M. Carcione, Xu Wen-hao, and Fang Zhi-jian. Prediction of carbonate permeability from multiresolution CT scans and deep learning[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2024, 21(4): 805-819.
[2] Zhang Lei, Wang Jian, Jiao RuiLi2, Hao Chen, Wang Xiu-Ming, and Ji You-Ming. Delineation of bed boundaries of array induction logging curves using deep learning[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2021, 18(1): 45-53.
[3] Cai Yin, Mei-Ling Shyu, Tu Yue-Xuan, Teng Yun-Tian, and Hu Xing-Xing. Anomaly detection of earthquake precursor data using long short-term memory networks*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 16(3): 257-268.
[4] Cao Zhong-Lin, Cao Jun-Xing, Wu Fu-Rong, He Guang-Ming, Zhou Qiang, and Wu Yu-Lin. Mixed Cadzow filtering method in fractional Fourier domain[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(2): 271-279.
[5] Chang De-Kuan, Yang Wu-Yang, Wang Yi-Hui, Yang Qing, Wei Xin-Jian, Feng Xiao-Ying. Random noise suppression for seismic data using a non-local Bayes algorithm[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(1): 91-98.
[6] Gan Shu-Wei, Wang Shou-Dong, Chen Yang-Kang, Chen Jiang-Long, Zhong Wei, Zhang Cheng-Lin. Improved random noise attenuation using f–x empirical mode decomposition and local similarity[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(1): 127-134.
[7] Ma Yan-Yan, Li Guo-Fa, Wang Yao-Jun, Zhou Hui, Zhang Bao-Jiang. Random noise attenuation by f–x spatial projection-based complex empirical mode decomposition predictive filtering[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2015, 12(1): 47-54.
[8] Liu Cai, Chen Chang-Le, Wang Dian, Liu Yang, Wang Shi-Yu, Zhang Liang. Seismic dip estimation based on the two-dimensional Hilbert transform and its application in random noise attenuation[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2015, 12(1): 55-63.
[9] SHANG Shuai, HAN Li-Guo, 吕Qing-Tian , TAN Chen-Qing. Seismic random noise suppression using an adaptive nonlocal means algorithm[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2013, 10(1): 33-40.
[10] CAI Han-Peng, HE Zhen-Hua, HUANG De-Ji. Seismic data denoising based on mixed time-frequency methods[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2011, 8(4): 319-327.
[11] WANG De-Li, TONG Zhong-Fei, TANG Chen, ZHU Heng. An iterative curvelet thresholding algorithm for seismic random noise attenuation[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2010, 7(4): 315-324.
[12] LIU Zhi-Peng, CHEN Xiao-Hong, LI Jing-Ye. Noncausal spatial prediction filtering based on an ARMA model[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2009, 6(2): 122-128.
Copyright © 2011 APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
Support by Beijing Magtech Co.ltd support@magtech.com.cn