APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
 
        Home  |  Copyright  |  About Journal  |  Editorial Board  |  Indexed-in  |  Subscriptions  |  Download  |  Contacts Us  |  中文
APPLIED GEOPHYSICS  2021, Vol. 18 Issue (1): 94-100    DOI: 10.1007/s11770-021-0853-y
article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
Least-squares reverse time migration method using the factorization of the Hessian matrix
Sun Xiao-Dong 1,2, Teng Hou-Hua♦3 , Ren Li-Juan 4, Wang Wei-Qi 1, and Li Zhen-Chun 1
1. Key Laboratory of Deep Oil& gas, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580;
2. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reservoir Geology, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao,266580.
3. Geophysical Research Institute of SINOPEC Shengli Oilfi eld, Dongying, 257022;
4. Zhanjiang Branch of CNOOC (China) Co., Ltd, Zhanjiang, 524000.
 Download: PDF (913 KB)   HTML ( KB)   Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Least-squares reverse time migration (LSRTM) can eliminate imaging artifacts in an iterative way based on the concept of inversion, and it can restore imaging amplitude step by step. LSRTM can provide a high-resolution migration section and can be applied to irregular and poor-quality seismic data and achieve good results. Steeply dipping reflectors and complex faults are imaged by using wavefield extrapolation based on a two-way wave equation. However, the high computational cost limits the method’s application in practice. A fast approach to realize LSRTM in the imaging domain is provided in this paper to reduce the computational cost significantly and enhance its computational efficiency. The method uses the Kronecker decomposition algorithm to estimate the Hessian matrix. A low-rank matrix can be used to calculate the Kronecker factor, which involves the calculation of Green’s function at the source and receiver point. The approach also avoids the direct construction of the whole Hessian matrix. Factorization-based LSRTM calculates the production of lowrank matrices instead of repeatedly calculating migration and demigration. Unlike traditional LSRTM, factorization-based LSRTM can reduce calculation costs considerably while maintaining comparable imaging quality. While having the same imaging effect, factorizationbased LSRTM consumes half the running time of conventional LSRTM. In this regard, the application of factorization-based LSRTM has a promising advantage in reducing the computational cost. Ambient noise caused by this method can be removed by applying a commonly used filtering method without significantly degrading the imaging quality.
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Key wordsleast-squares   reverse time migration   factorization   Hessian matrix     
Received: 2019-06-21;
Fund:

The research gets funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.41574098 & 41630964), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.18CX02059A), the Development Fund of Key Laboratory of Deep Oil & Gas (No. 20CX02111A), SINOPEC Key Laboratory of Geophysics open fund (No. wtyjy-wx2018-01-07), Shandong Natural Science Foundation of China (No. ZR2020MD048) and the Major Scientific and Technological Projects of CNPC (No. ZD2019-183-003).

Corresponding Authors: Teng Hou-Hua (E-mail:544203089@qq.com).   
 E-mail: 544203089@qq.com
About author: Sun Xiao-Dong (doctor) is working as a lecturer in the Department of Applied Geophysics at the China University of Petroleum (East China). His research interests include wave propagation, inversion, and imaging. sunxd@upc.edu.cn
Cite this article:   
. Least-squares reverse time migration method using the factorization of the Hessian matrix[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2021, 18(1): 94-100.
 
No references of article
[1] Huang Jian-Ping, Mu Xin-Ru?, Li Zhen-Chun, Li Qing-Yang, Yuan Shuang-Qi , and Guo Yun-Dong. Pure qP-wave least-squares reverse time migration in vertically transverse isotropic media and its application to field data*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 17(2): 208-220.
[2] Qu Ying-Ming, Zhou Chang, Worral Qurmet, Li Zhen-Chun, Wang Chang-Bo, and Sun Jun-Zhi. Elastic reverse-time migration in irregular tunnel environment based on polar coordinates*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 17(2): 253-266.
[3] Lv Yu-zeng, Wang Hong-hua, Gong Jun-bo. Application of GPR reverse time migration in tunnel lining cavity imaging*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 17(2): 277-284.
[4] Li Kai-Rui and He Bing-Shou. Extraction of P- and S-wave angle-domain common-image gathers based on fi rst-order velocity-dilatation-rotation equations*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 17(1): 92-102.
[5] Liu Ming-Zhu and He Bing-Shoug. Suppress numerical dispersion in reversetime migration of acoustic wave equation using optimal nearly analytic discrete method*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 17(1): 133-142.
[6] Li Yu-Sheng, Li Ning, Yuan ye, Wu Hong-Liang, Feng Zhou, and Liu Peng. Optimizing the wavefi eld storage strategy in refl ection-acoustic logging reverse-time migration*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 16(4): 537-544.
[7] Qu Ying-Ming, Huang Chong-Peng, Liu Chang, Zhou Chang, Li Zhen-Chun, and Worral Qurmet. Multiparameter least-squares reverse time migration for acoustic–elastic coupling media based on ocean bottom cable data*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 16(3): 327-337.
[8] Cai Zhong-Zheng, Han Li-Guo, and Xu Zhuo. Passive multiple reverse time migration imaging based on wave decomposition and normalized imaging conditions*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 16(3): 338-348.
[9] Liu Guo-Feng, Meng Xiao-Hong, Yu Zhen-Jiang, and Liu Ding-Jin. An efficient scheme for multi-GPU TTI reverse time migration*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 16(1): 61-69.
[10] Xie Wei, Wang Yan-Chun, Liu Xue-Qing, Bi Chen-Chen, Zhang Feng-Qi, Fang Yuan, and Tahir Azeem. Nonlinear joint PP–PS AVO inversion based on improved Bayesian inference and LSSVM*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 16(1): 70-82.
[11] Wang Bao-Li ,Gao Jing-Huai . The research and implementation of velocity analysis methods for reverse time migration angle-gather[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(3-4(2)): 682-696.
[12] Yang Hai-Yan, Li Feng-Ping, Chen Shen-En, Yue Jian-Hua, Guo Fu-Sheng, Chen Xiao, and Zhang Hua. An inversion of transient electromagnetic data from a conical source[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(3-4): 545-555.
[13] Xue Hao and Liu Yang. Reverse-time migration using multidirectional wavefield decomposition method[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(2): 222-233.
[14] Sun Xiao-Dong, Jia Yan-Rui, Zhang Min, Li Qing-Yang, and Li Zhen-Chun. Least squares reverse-time migration in the pseudodepth domain and reservoir exploration[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(2): 234-239.
[15] Ren Ying-Jun, Huang Jian-Ping, Yong Peng, Liu Meng-Li, Cui Chao, and Yang Ming-Wei. Optimized staggered-grid finite-difference operators using window functions[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(2): 253-260.
Copyright © 2011 APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
Support by Beijing Magtech Co.ltd support@magtech.com.cn