APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
 
        Home  |  Copyright  |  About Journal  |  Editorial Board  |  Indexed-in  |  Subscriptions  |  Download  |  Contacts Us  |  中文
APPLIED GEOPHYSICS  2020, Vol. 17 Issue (2): 267-276    DOI: 10.1007/s11770-020-0814-x
article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
Reverse time migration imaging of tunnels via the finite element method using an unstructured mesh*
Wang Jing 1,2,3, Liu Jiang-Ping ♦4, Cheng Fei 5, Yang Huai-Jie 6, Huang Yi-Fan 1,2,3
1. School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China.
2. Key Laboratory of Roads and Railway Engineering Safety Control (Shijiazhuang Tiedao University), Ministry of Education, Shijiazhuang 050043, China.
3. Hebei Technology and innovation center on safe and effi cient mining of metal mines, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University,Shijiazhuang 050043, China.
4. Hubei Subsurface Multi-scale Imaging Key Laboratory, Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China.
5. College of Marine Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China.
6. Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology, Beijing 100029, China.
 Download: PDF (1785 KB)   HTML ( KB)   Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Wavefield extrapolation is critical in reverse time migration (RTM). The finite difference method is primarily used to achieve wavefield extrapolation in case of the RTM imaging of tunnels. However, complex tunnel models, including those for karsts and fault fracture zones, are constructed using regular grids with straight curves, which can cause numerical dispersion and reduce the imaging accuracy. In this study, wavefield extrapolation was conducted for tunnel RTM using the finite element method, wherein an unstructured mesh was considered to be the body-fitted partition in a complex model. Further, a Poynting vector calculation equation suitable for the unstructured mesh considered in the finite element method was established to suppress the interference owing to low-frequency noise. The tunnel space was considered during wavefield extrapolation to suppress the mirror artifacts based on the fl exibility of mesh generation. Finally, the influence of the survey layouts (one and two sidewalls) on the tunnel imaging results was investigated. The RTM results obtained for a simple tunnel model with an inclined interface demonstrate that the method based on unstructured meshes can effectively suppress the low-frequency noise and mirror artifacts, obtaining clear imaging results. Furthermore, the two-sidewall tunnel survey layout can be used to accurately obtain the real position of the inclined interface ahead of the tunnel face. The complex tunnel numerical modeling and actual data migration results denote the eff ectiveness of the finite element method in which an unstructured mesh is used.
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Key wordsTunnel advanced prediction   finite element method   unstructured mesh   Poynting vector   mirror artifacts     
Received: 2018-04-25;
Corresponding Authors: Jiangping Liu (Email: liujp_geop@126.com)   
 E-mail: liujp_geop@126.com
About author: Wang Jing is a lecturer at Shijiazhuang Tiedao University. He received his PhD in 2017 from China University of Geosciences (Wuhan). He also got his Bachelor’s degree and Maeter’s d e g r e e f r o m C h i n a U n i v e r s i t y o f G e o s c i e n c e s ( Wu h a n ) . H i s undergraduate and postgraduate majors are geophysics, and his doctoral major is geodetection and information technology. His research interests are seismic wave numerical simulation and migration imaging. Email: wangjing@stdu.edu.cn.
Cite this article:   
. Reverse time migration imaging of tunnels via the finite element method using an unstructured mesh*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 17(2): 267-276.
 
No references of article
[1] Feng De-Shan , Zhang Hua , and Wang Xun . Second-generation wavelet fi nite element based on the lifting scheme for GPR simulation*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 17(1): 143-153.
[2] Kang Zheng-Ming, Ke Shi-Zhen, Li Xin, Mi Jin-Tai, Ni Wei-Ning, and Li Ming. 3D FEM simulation of responses of LWD multi-mode resistivity imaging sonde[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(3-4): 401-412.
[3] Cao Xiao-Yue, Yin Chang-Chun, Zhang Bo, Huang Xin, Liu Yun-He, and Cai Jing. 3D magnetotelluric inversions with unstructured finite-element and limited-memory quasi-Newton methods[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(3-4): 556-565.
[4] Zhou Feng, Tang Jing-Tian, Ren Zheng-Yong, Zhang Zhi-Yong, Chen Huang, Huang Xiang-Yu, and Zhong Yi-Yuan. A hybrid finite-element and integral-equation method for forward modeling of 3D controlled-source electromagnetic induction[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(3-4): 536-544.
[5] Xu Kai-Jun and Sun Jie. Induced polarization in a 2.5D marine controlled-source electromagnetic field based on the adaptive finite-element method[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(2): 332-341.
[6] Wang Bing, Kuo Zhang, Guo Tao, He Liu, Zhang Xiao-Liang. Acoustic reflection well logging modeling using the frequency-domain finite-element method with a hybrid PML[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(1): 35-45.
[7] Huang Wei, Ben Fang, Yin Chang-Chun, Meng Qing-Min, Li Wen-Jie, Liao Gui-Xiang, Wu Shan, Xi Yong-Zai. Three-dimensional arbitrarily anisotropic modeling for time-domain airborne electromagnetic surveys[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(3): 431-440.
[8] Zhang Kuo, Wu Xi-Ling, Yan Jing-Fu, Cai Jia-Tie. Electromagnetic holographic sensitivity field of two-phase flow in horizontal wells[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(1): 40-48.
[9] Zhang Wen-Hui, Fu Li-Yun, Zhang Yan, Jin Wei-Jun. Computation of elastic properties of 3D digital cores from the Longmaxi shale[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(2): 364-374.
[10] Li Wen-Ben, Zeng Zhao-Fa, Li Jing, Chen Xiong, Wang Kun, Xia Zhao. 2.5D forward modeling and inversion of frequency-domain airborne electromagnetic data[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(1): 37-47.
[11] Hu Ying-Cai, Li Tong-Lin, Fan Cui-Song, Wang Da-Yong, Li Jian-Ping. Three-dimensional tensor controlled-source electromagnetic modeling based on the vector finite-element method[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2015, 12(1): 35-46.
[12] YE Yi-Xin, LI Yu-Guo, DENG Ju-Zhi, LI Ze-Lin. 2.5D induced polarization forward modeling using the adaptive finite-element method[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2014, 11(4): 500-507.
[13] YIN Cheng-Fang, KE Shi-Zhen, XU Wei, JIANG Ming, ZHANG Lei-Jie, TAO Jie. 3D laterolog array sonde design and response simulation[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2014, 11(2): 223-234.
[14] HE Tao, LI Hong-Lin, ZOU Chang-Chun. 3D topographic correction of the BSR heat flow and detection of focused fluid flow[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2014, 11(2): 197-206.
[15] XU Wei, KE Shi-Zhen, LI An-Zong, CHEN Peng, ZHU Jun, ZHANG Wei. Response simulation and theoretical calibration of a dual-induction resistivity LWD tool[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2014, 11(1): 31-40.
Copyright © 2011 APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
Support by Beijing Magtech Co.ltd support@magtech.com.cn