APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
 
        Home  |  Copyright  |  About Journal  |  Editorial Board  |  Indexed-in  |  Subscriptions  |  Download  |  Contacts Us  |  中文
APPLIED GEOPHYSICS  2019, Vol. 16 Issue (3): 349-357    DOI: 10.1007/s11770-019-0768-z
article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
Inverse Gaussian-beam common-refl ectionpoint-stack imaging in crosswell seismic tomography*
Wei Zheng Rong, Yang Fei-Long, Liu Bao-Hua, and Pei Yan-Liang
1 College of the Geological Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, Xi’an, 710065 China.
2 College of the Geoscience and Engineering, Xi’an Shiyou University Xi’an, 710064 China.
3 National Deep See Center, Qingdao, 266273, China.
4 The First Institute of Oceanography, SOA, Qingdao, 266061 China.
 Download: PDF (1775 KB)   HTML ( KB)   Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract To solve problems in small-scale and complex structural traps, the inverse Gaussian-beam stack-imaging method is commonly used to process crosswell seismic wave reflection data. Owing to limited coverage, the imaging quality of conventional ray-based crosswell seismic stack imaging is poor in complex areas; moreover, the imaging range is small and with sever interference because of the arc phenomenon in seismic migration. Thus, we propose the inverse Gaussian-beam stack imaging, in which Gaussian weight functions of rays contributing to the geophones energy are calculated and used to decompose the seismic wavefield. This effectively enlarges the coverage of the reflection points and improves the transverse resolution. Compared with the traditional VSP–CDP stack imaging, the proposed methods extends the imaging range, yields higher horizontal resolution, and is more adaptable to complex geological structures. The method is applied to model a complex structure in the K-area. The results suggest that the wave group of the target layer is clearer, the resolution is higher, and the main frequency of the crosswell seismic section is higher than that in surface seismic exploration The effectiveness and robustness of the method are verifi ed by theoretical model and practical data.
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Key words crosswell seismic   Gaussian   weight function   inverse beam   common reflection   stack   imaging     
Received: 2019-01-21;
Fund:

This research work is sponsored by the National Key R&D Plan Project (Grant No. 2016YFC0303900) and Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41374145).

Corresponding Authors: Yang Fei-Long, e-mail:feilongy @xsyu.edn.cn   
 E-mail: feilongy @xsyu.edn.cn
About author: Wei Zheng-Rong is a Ph.D. candidate in Geophysical Exploration at Chang’an University, China. His research interests are borehole seismic data processing, seismic wavefield modeling, and migration imaging. E-mail: 544109454@qq.com
Cite this article:   
. Inverse Gaussian-beam common-refl ectionpoint-stack imaging in crosswell seismic tomography*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 16(3): 349-357.
 
No references of article
[1] Ma Yong, Bi Jin-Meng, and Gao Lei. Three-dimensional velocity structure and tectonic characteristics of earthquake area in Yibin*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 16(3): 269-277.
[2] Lee Sheng-Qing, Chen Ming, Gu Xi-Hao, Su Yuan-Da, and Tang Xiao-Ming. Application of four-component dipole shear refl ection imaging to interpret the geological structure around a deviated well*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 16(3): 293-302.
[3] Cai Zhong-Zheng, Han Li-Guo, and Xu Zhuo. Passive multiple reverse time migration imaging based on wave decomposition and normalized imaging conditions*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 16(3): 338-348.
[4] Wu Xiao, Liu Yang, Wang Yong, Xu Shi-Gang, and Jia Wan-Li. An improved fast converted-wave imaging method[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 16(2): 173-194.
[5] Gong Hao, Chen Hao, He Xiao, Su Chang, Wang Xiu-Ming, Wang Bai-Cun, and Yan Xiao-Hui. Modeling and inversions  of acoustic  reflection logging imaging using the combined monopole–dipole measurement mode[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(3-4): 393-400.
[6] Kang Zheng-Ming, Ke Shi-Zhen, Li Xin, Mi Jin-Tai, Ni Wei-Ning, and Li Ming. 3D FEM simulation of responses of LWD multi-mode resistivity imaging sonde[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(3-4): 401-412.
[7] Yan Jian-Ping, He Xu, Hu Qin-Hong, Liang Qiang, Tang Hong-Ming, Feng Chun-Zhen, and Geng Bin. Lower Es3 in Zhanhua Sag, Jiyang Depression: a case study for lithofacies classification in lacustrine mud shale[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(2): 151-164.
[8] Xue Hao and Liu Yang. Reverse-time migration using multidirectional wavefield decomposition method[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(2): 222-233.
[9] Yan Liang-Jun, Chen Xiao-Xiong, Tang Hao, Xie Xing-Bing, Zhou Lei, Hu Wen-Bao, Wang Zhong-Xin. Continuous TDEM for monitoring shale hydraulic fracturing[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(1): 26-34.
[10] Zheng Que, Liu Cai, Tian You, Zhu Hong-Xiang. Seismic imaging of the middle and upper crust by double-difference tomography: the Haicheng earthquake (Ms 7.3) in Liaoning Province[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(1): 125-136.
[11] Liu Ji-Cheng, Xie Xiao-Bi, Chen Bo. Reverse-time migration and amplitude correction in the angle-domain based on Poynting vector[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(4): 505-516.
[12] Sun Xiao-Dong, Li Zhen-Chun, Jia Yan-Rui. Variable-grid reverse-time migration of different  seismic survey data[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(4): 517-522.
[13] Wang Jun-Lu, Lin Pin-Rong, Wang Meng, Li Dang, Li Jian-Hua. Three-dimensional tomography using high-power induced polarization with the similar central gradient array[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(2): 291-300.
[14] Zhang Kuo, Wu Xi-Ling, Yan Jing-Fu, Cai Jia-Tie. Electromagnetic holographic sensitivity field of two-phase flow in horizontal wells[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(1): 40-48.
[15] He Run, You Jia-Chun, Liu Bin, Wang Yan-Chun, Deng Shi-Guang, Zhang Feng-Qi. High-order generalized screen propagator migration based on particle swarm optimization[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(1): 64-72.
Copyright © 2011 APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
Support by Beijing Magtech Co.ltd support@magtech.com.cn