APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
 
        Home  |  Copyright  |  About Journal  |  Editorial Board  |  Indexed-in  |  Subscriptions  |  Download  |  Contacts Us  |  中文
APPLIED GEOPHYSICS  2016, Vol. 13 Issue (4): 667-682    DOI: 10.1007/s11770-016-0583-8
article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
Boundary-reflected waves and ultrasonic coda waves in rock physics experiments
Fu Bo-Ye1,2, Fu Li-Yun1, Wei Wei1, and Zhang Yan1
1. Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource Research, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China.
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
 Download: PDF (1887 KB)   HTML ( KB)   Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Ultrasonic coda waves are widely used to study high-frequency scattering. However, ultrasonic coda waves are strongly affected by interference from by boundary-reflected waves. To understand the effect of boundary-reflected waves, we performed ultrasonic experiments using aluminum and shale samples, and the rotating staggered-mesh finite-difference method to simulate the wavefield. We analyzed the wavefield characteristics at the different receiving points and the interference characteristics of the boundary-reflected waves with the ultrasonic coda wave, and the effect of sample geometry on the ultrasonic coda waves. The increase in the aspect ratio of the samples delays the interference effect of the laterally reflected waves and reduces the effect on the ultrasonic coda waves. The main waves interfering with the ultrasonic coda waves are laterally reflected PP-, PS-, PPP-, and PPS-waves. The scattering and attenuation of the high-frequency energy in actual rocks can weaken the interference of laterally reflected waves with the ultrasonic coda waves.
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Key wordsRock physics   boundary-reflected waves   coda wave, interference   numerical simulation     
Received: 2016-05-18;
Fund:

This work was supported by the Strategic Leading Science and Technology Programme (Class B) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDB10010400).

Cite this article:   
. Boundary-reflected waves and ultrasonic coda waves in rock physics experiments[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(4): 667-682.
 
[1] ASTM Standard 4543, 2002, Practice for Preparing Rock Core Specimens and Determining Dimensional Shape Tolerances, American Society for the Testing of Materials: Philadelphia, PA.
[2] Basu, A., and Aydin, A., 2006, Evaluation of ultrasonic testing in rock material characterization: Geotechnical Testing Journal, 29(2), 117−125.
[3] Birks, A. S., Green, R. E., and McIntire, P., 1991, Ultrasonic Testing: in Nondestructive Testing Handbook, Vol. 7, American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Columbus, OH, USA.
[4] Bieniawski, Z. T., and Hawkes, I., 1978, Suggested methods for determining tensile strength of rock materials - 1. suggested method for determining direct tensile strength: International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 15(3), 99−103.
[5] Cherry, J. T., 1962, The azimuthal and polar radiation patterns obtained from a horizontal stress applied at the surface of an elastic half space: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 52(1), 27−36.
[6] Deng, J., Wang, S., and Han, D., 2009, The velocity and attenuation anisotropy of shale at ultrasonic frequency: Journal of Geophysics & Engineering, 6(3), 269−278.
[7] Franklin, J. A., and Dusseault, M. B., 1991, Rock engineering applications: McGraw-Hill, Incorporated, New York, USA, 431p.
[8] Gladwin, M. T., and Stacey, F. D., 1974, Anelastic degradation of acoustic pulses in rock: Physics of the Earth & Planetary Interiors, 8(4), 332−336.
[9] Grêt, A., Snieder, R., and Scales, J., 2006, Time-lapse monitoring of rock properties with coda wave interferometry: Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 111(B3), 1581−1600.
[10] Guo, M., and Fu, L., 2007, Stress associated coda attenuation from ultrasonic waveform measurements: Geophysical Research Letters, 34(9), 252−254.
[11] Guo, M., Fu, L., and Jing, B., 2009, Comparison of stress-associated coda attenuation and intrinsic attenuation from ultrasonic measurements: Geophysical Journal International, 178(1), 447−456.
[12] Saenger, E. H., and Bohlen, T., 2004, Finite-difference modeling of viscoelastic and anisotropic wave propagation using the rotated staggered grid: Geophysics, 69(2), 583−591.
[13] Schmerr, L. W., and Sedov, A., 1989, An elastodynamic model for compressional and shear wave transducers: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86(5), 1988−1999.
[14] Sondergeld, C. H., and Rai, C. S., 1987, Laboratory observations of shear wave propagation in anisotropic media: Leading Edge, 11(2), 918−918.
[15] Song, J. G., Gong, Y. L., and Li, S., 2015, High-resolution frequency-domain radon transform and variable-depth streamer data deghosting: Applied Geophysics, 12(4), 564−572.
[16] Wei, W., and Fu, L. Y., 2014, Monte carlo simulation of stress-associated scattering attenuation from laboratory ultrasonic measurements: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 104(2), 931−943.
[17] Wei, J. X., and Wang, C. Y., 2003, Study of s-wave test and measurement technique in laboratory: Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 38(6), 630−635.
[18] Wu, R. S., and Aki, K., 1988a, Introduction: seismic wave scattering in three-dimensionally heterogeneous earth: Pure & Applied Geophysics, 128(1), 1−6.
[19] Wu, R. S., and Aki, K., 1988b, Multiple scattering and energy transfer of seismic waves—separation of scattering effect from intrinsic attenuation ii. application of the theory to Hindu Kush region: Pure & Applied Geophysics, 128(1), 49−80.
[20] Yong, A. N., and Wei, L. C., 2007, Experimental study on effective size of rock samples in the method of frequency-amplitude ratio: Journal of Oil & Gas Technology, 29(1), 48−51.
[21] Zhang, H., Thurber, C., and Rowe, C., 2003, Automatic P-wave arrival detection and picking with multiscale wavelet analysis for single-component recordings: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 93(5), 1904−1912.
[22] Zhang, L. X., Fu, L. Y., and Pei, Z. L., 2010, Finite difference modeling of biot's poroelastic equations with unsplit eonvolutional pml and rotated staggered grid: Chinese Journal of Geophysics- Chinese Edition, 53(10), 2470−2483.
[23] Zhang, Y., Fu, L. Y., Zhang, L., Wei, W., and Guan, X., 2014, Finite difference modeling of ultrasonic propagation (coda waves) in digital porous cores with un-split convolutional pml and rotated staggered grid: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 104(5), 75−89.
[24] Zhubayev, A., Houben, M. E., Smeulders, D. M., and Barnhoorn, A., 2015, Ultrasonic velocity and attenuation anisotropy of shales, Whitby, United Kingdom: Geophysics, 81(1), D45−D56.
[25] Zhu, Z. Y., and Tang, X. M., 1992, Longitudinal wave and transverse wave radiation acoustic field directivity of transducer in semi-infinite solid medium: Technical Acoustics, (1), 47−51.
[1] Ma Ru-Peng, Ba Jing, Carcione José Maria, Zhou Xin, and Li Fan. Dispersion and attenuation of compressional waves in tight oil reservoirs: Experiments and simulations*[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 16(1): 36-49.
[2] Hu Jun, Cao Jun-Xing, He Xiao-Yan, Wang Quan-Feng, and Xu Bin. Numerical simulation of fault activity owing to hydraulic fracturing[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(3-4): 367-381.
[3] Dai Shi-Kun, Zhao Dong-Dong, Zhang Qian-Jiang, Li Kun, Chen Qing-Rui, and Wang Xu-Long. Three-dimensional numerical modeling of gravity anomalies based on Poisson equation in space-wavenumber mixed domain[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(3-4): 513-523.
[4] Hu Song, Li Jun, Guo Hong-Bo, Wang Chang-Xue. Analysis and application of the response characteristics of DLL and LWD resistivity in horizontal well[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(3): 351-362.
[5] Yang Si-Tong, Wei Jiu-Chuan, Cheng Jiu-Long, Shi Long-Qing, Wen Zhi-Jie. Numerical simulations of full-wave fields and analysis of channel wave characteristics in 3-D coal mine roadway models[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(4): 621-630.
[6] Tao Bei, Chen De-Hua, He Xiao, Wang Xiu-Ming. Rough interfaces and ultrasonic imaging logging behind casing[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(4): 683-688.
[7] Chang Jiang-Hao, Yu Jing-Cun, Liu Zhi-Xin. Three-dimensional numerical modeling of full-space transient electromagnetic responses of water in goaf[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(3): 539-552.
[8] Zhang Qian-Jiang, Dai Shi-Kun, Chen Long-Wei, Qiang Jian-Ke, Li Kun, Zhao Dong-Dong. Finite element numerical simulation of 2.5D direct current method based on mesh refinement and recoarsement[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(2): 257-266.
[9] Liu Yang, Li Xiang-Yang, Chen Shuang-Quan. Application of the double absorbing boundary condition in seismic modeling[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2015, 12(1): 111-119.
[10] Cho , Kwang-Hyun . Discriminating between explosions and earthquakes[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2014, 11(4): 429-436.
[11] YIN Cheng-Fang, KE Shi-Zhen, XU Wei, JIANG Ming, ZHANG Lei-Jie, TAO Jie. 3D laterolog array sonde design and response simulation[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2014, 11(2): 223-234.
[12] HE Yi-Yuan, ZHANG Bao-Ping, DUAN Yu-Ting, XUE Cheng-Jin, YAN Xin, HE Chuan, HU Tian-Yue. Numerical simulation of surface and downhole deformation induced by hydraulic fracturing[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2014, 11(1): 63-72.
[13] ZHAO Jian-Guo, SHI Rui-Qi. Perfectly matched layer-absorbing boundary condition for finite-element time-domain modeling of elastic wave equations[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2013, 10(3): 323-336.
[14] LIU Yun, WANG Xu-Ben, WANG Bin. Numerical modeling of the 2D time-domain transient electromagnetic secondary field of the line source of the current excitation[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2013, 10(2): 134-144.
[15] CHANG Suo-Liang, LIU Yang. A truncated implicit high-order finite-difference scheme combined with boundary conditions[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2013, 10(1): 53-62.
Copyright © 2011 APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
Support by Beijing Magtech Co.ltd support@magtech.com.cn