APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
 
        首页  |  版权声明  |  期刊介绍  |  编 委 会  |  收录情况  |  期刊订阅  |  下载中心  |  联系我们  |  English
应用地球物理  2025, Vol. 22 Issue (2): 523-534    DOI: 10.1007/s11770-024-1165-9
论文 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
鄂西页岩气开采区微震检测定位影响因素分析
郝万鹏,张丽芬 *,赵艳南,郑荣荧*,秦维秉,李井冈
1. 中国地震局地震研究所,中国地震局地震大地测量重点实验室,430071;2. 高坝大库运行安全湖北省重点实验室,武汉市六合路1号,430010;3. 中国长江三峡集团,武汉市六合路1号,430010;4. 北京防灾科技有限公司,北京燕郊,101601
Analysis of factors influencing microseismic detection and location in shale gas extraction areas of western Hubei
Hao Wan-peng, Zhang Li-fen,*, Zhao Yan-nan, Zheng Rong-ying,*, Qin Wei-bing, Li Jing-gang
1. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Geodesy, Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, Wuhan 430071, China 2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Operation Safety of High Dam and Large Reservoir, Yichang 443100 3. China Three Gorges Group, No.1 Liuhe Road, Wuhan city, 430010 4. Beijing Disaster Prevention Technology Co., LTD., Beijing 101110, China.
 全文: PDF (0 KB)   HTML ( KB)   输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      背景资料
摘要 本研究旨在探讨地震定位精度受多种因素影响的问题,并特别关注速度结构、台站分布和震相拾取对定位结果的影响。为此,我们采用PALM微震检测定位方法,对鄂西地区布设的地震观测台阵监测数据进行了系统性分析。研究中对比了不同速度结构模型、仪器类型和台站分布对地震定位结果的具体影响。研究发现,PALM方法能够显著改善速度结构模型对地震定位精度的影响,而宽频带地震仪器的使用和更均匀的台站分布有利于获得更高精度的定位结果。进一步地,我们通过联合使用不同类型的观测仪器,构建了方位角分布良好的观测台阵,从而为研究区域构建了一个更完备的地震目录。这些发现不仅提高了地震定位的精度,而且为区域地震监测网络的优化设计和地震风险评估提供了科学依据。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词地震定位   速度结构   台站分布   人工智能检测   页岩气开采     
Abstract: The study area is rich in shale gas resources and has reached the stage of comprehensive development. Shale gas extraction poses risks such as induced seismicity and well closure, compounded by the limited availability of fixed seismic monitoring stations nearby. To address these challenges, a dense observation array was developed within the study area to monitor and analyze microseismic activity during hydraulic fracturing. Microseismic events generated by hydraulic fracturing typically exhibit low amplitude and signal-to-noise ratio, rendering traditional manual analysis methods impractical. To overcome these limitations, an innovative artificial intelligence method combining picking-association-location (PAL) and match-expandshift-stack (MESS) techniques (PALM) has been utilized for automated seismic detection. Numerous factors influence the accuracy of microseismic detection and localization. To evaluate these factors, the effects of various velocity structure models, instrument types, and station distributions on seismic location were analyzed and compared. The results indicate that the PALM method significantly mitigates the influence of velocity structure models on seismic location accuracy. Additionally, the use of broadband seismic instruments and a uniform station distribution enhances the precision of seismic location results. Furthermore, by integrating data from different types of observation instruments, a comprehensive seismic catalog for the study area was established. These findings not only enhance seismic location accuracy but also provide valuable guidance for optimizing regional seismic monitoring network design and improving seismic risk assessment.
Key wordsearthquake location    velocity structure model    station distribution    PALM    shale gas   
收稿日期: 2024-09-02;
基金资助:Thanks to the support of the China Three Gorges Corporation Science and Technology Fund, with the numbers 0799275, and the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China, with the numbers 42174177 and 62106239.
通讯作者: Zhang Li-fen ( Email: zhanglf112@163.com); Zheng Rong-ying ( Email: zry19950315@163.com).     E-mail: zhanglf112@163.com;zry19950315@163.com
作者简介: 郝万鹏,研究生,主修微震监测与震源定位。?
引用本文:   
. 鄂西页岩气开采区微震检测定位影响因素分析[J]. 应用地球物理, 2025, 22(2): 523-534.
. Analysis of factors influencing microseismic detection and location in shale gas extraction areas of western Hubei[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2025, 22(2): 523-534.
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 马永, 毕金孟, 高磊. 宜宾地区三维速度结构及震区构造特征*[J]. 应用地球物理, 2019, 16(3): 269-277.
版权所有 © 2011 应用地球物理
技术支持 北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司