APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
 
        首页  |  版权声明  |  期刊介绍  |  编 委 会  |  收录情况  |  期刊订阅  |  下载中心  |  联系我们  |  English
应用地球物理  2014, Vol. 11 Issue (1): 31-40    DOI: 10.1007/s11770-014-0417-5
论文 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
随钻双感应测井仪三维响应模拟及理论刻度
许巍1,2,柯式镇1,2,李安宗3,陈鹏3,朱军3,张维3
1. 中国石油大学(北京)地球物理与信息工程学院,北京 102249
2. 中国石油大学(北京)油气资源与探测国家重点实验室,北京 102249
3. 中国石油集团测井有限公司随钻测井仪器研究中心,西安 710061
Response simulation and theoretical calibration of a dual-induction resistivity LWD tool
Xu Wei1,2, Ke Shi-Zhen1,2, Li An-Zong3, Chen Peng3, Zhu Jun3, and Zhang Wei3
1. College of Geophysics and Information Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China.
2. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China.
3. China Petroleum Logging CO. LTD., Xi’an, Shaanxi 710061, China.
 全文: PDF (1105 KB)   HTML ( KB)   输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      背景资料
摘要 本文利用矢量有限元法模拟了一种新型的随钻双感应测井仪在三维非均匀地层中的响应,分析了井眼、泥浆、侵入带、围岩和仪器偏心对仪器响应的影响,并对仪器刻度时的最佳刻度环参数和刻度系数进行了研究。研究表明:这种新型的随钻双感应测井仪的探测深度优于现有随钻电磁波测井仪的探测深度,并具有一定的方位电导率探测能力。深感应和中感应具有不同的最佳刻度环参数和刻度系数,通过刻度均可与地层电导率保持线性关系。由于探测深度和分辨率不同,深感应和中感应受地层模型参数的影响程度不一样,因而校正系数也不相同。文中结果对随钻双感应测井仪器的研发和资料的应用具有参考意义。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
许巍
柯式镇
李安宗
陈鹏
朱军
张维
关键词随钻双感应测井   矢量有限元   仪器刻度     
Abstract: In this paper, responses of a new dual-induction resistivity logging-while-drilling (LWD) tool in 3D inhomogeneous formation models are simulated by the vector finite element method (VFEM), the influences of the borehole, invaded zone, surrounding strata, and tool eccentricity are analyzed, and calibration loop parameters and calibration coefficients of the LWD tool are discussed. The results show that the tool has a greater depth of investigation than that of the existing electromagnetic propagation LWD tools and is more sensitive to azimuthal conductivity. Both deep and medium induction responses have linear relationships with the formation conductivity, considering optimal calibration loop parameters and calibration coefficients. Due to the different depths of investigation and resolution, deep induction and medium induction are affected differently by the formation model parameters, thereby having different correction factors. The simulation results can provide theoretical references for the research and interpretation of the dual-induction resistivity LWD tools.
Key wordsDual-induction resistivity LWD tool   vector finite element method   tool calibration   
收稿日期: 2013-08-15;
基金资助:

本研究由国家油气重大专项(编号:2011ZX05020-002)资助。

引用本文:   
许巍,柯式镇,李安宗等. 随钻双感应测井仪三维响应模拟及理论刻度[J]. 应用地球物理, 2014, 11(1): 31-40.
XU Wei,KE Shi-Zhen,LI An-Zong et al. Response simulation and theoretical calibration of a dual-induction resistivity LWD tool[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2014, 11(1): 31-40.
 
[1] Anderson, B., Bonner, S., Luling, M. G., and Rosthal, R., 1992, Response of 2-MHz LWD resistivity and wireline induction tools in dipping bed sand laminated formations: J. Log Analyst, 33(5), 461 - 475.
[2] Allan, V., Sinclair, P., Prain, K., and Page, S., 2004, Design, development and field introduction of a unique low-frequency (20 Khz) induction resistivity loggingwhile-drilling tool: SPWLA 45th Annual Logging Symposium, 1 - 14.
[3] Dubcova, L., Solin, P., Cerveny, J., and Kus, P., 2010, Space and time adaptive two-mesh hp-finite element method for transient microwave heating problems: Electromagnetics, 30, 23 - 40.
[4] Doll, H. G., 1949, Introduction to induction logging and application to logging of wells drilled with oil base mud: Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1(6), 148 - 162.
[5] Feng, Q. N., Ju, X. D., Ke, S. Z., and Li, H. Y., 2010, Logging tool principle: China Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing.
[6] Hagiwara, T., Banning, E., Ostermeier, R., and Haugland, M., 2004, Effects of mandrel, borehole and invasion for tilt-coil antennas: 80th SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE 84245, 1 - 11.
[7] Jin, J. M., 2002, The finite element method in electromagnetics: Wiley-IEEE Press.
[8] Lovell, J. R., 1993, Finite element methods in resistivity logging: Ph.D.Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands.
[9] Meyer, W. H., Hart, E., and Jensen, K., 2008, Geosteering with a combination of extra deep and azimuthal resistivity tools: 84th SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE 115675, 1 - 14.
[10] Mahiout, S., 2012, High-resolution LWD resistivity images for carbonate facies identification and geosteering: 88th SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE 162274, 1 - 20.
[11] Matuszyk, P. J., and Torres-Verdin, C., 2011, HP-adaptive multi-physics finite-element simulation of wireline borehole sonic waveforms: 81th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 444 - 448.
[12] Pardo, D., Demkowicz, L., Torres-Verdin, C., and Paszynski, M., 2006, Two-dimensional high-accuracy simulation of resistivity logging-while-drilling (LWD) measurements using a self-adaptive goal-oriented hp-finite element method: SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 66(6), 2085 - 2106.
[13] Sun, X. Y., Nie, Z. P., Zhao, Y. W., Li, A. Y., and Luo, X., 2008, The electromagnetic modeling of logging-while-drilling tool in tilted anisotropic formations using vector finite element method: Chinese J. Geophysics (in Chinese), 51(5), 1600 - 1607.
[14] Shen J. S., Sun W. B., Zhao W. J., and Zeng W. C., 2008, Application of 2.5D cross-hole electromagnetic inversion in Gudao Oil Field, East China: Applied Geophysics, 5(3), 159 - 169.
[15] Solin, P., Dubcova, L., Cerveny, J., and Dolezel, I., 2010, Adaptive hp-FEM with arbitrary-level hanging nodes for Maxwell’s equations: Advances in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2(4), 518 - 532.
[16] Wei, B. J., 2007, Response and calibration of a new logging-while-drilling resistivity tool: Chinese J. Geophysics (in Chinese), 50(2), 632 - 641.
[17] Wang, H., Tao, G., Zhang, K., and Li, J., 2012, Numerical simulation for acoustic reflection imaging with FDM and FEM: 74th EAGE Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 1 - 5.
[18] Yuan, S. Y., and Wang, S. X., 2013, Edge-preserving noise reduction based on Bayesian inversion with directional difference constraints: Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 10(2), 1 - 10.
[19] Zhou, Q., and Hilliker, D. J., 1991, MWD resistivity tool response in a layered medium: Geophysics, 56(11), 1738 - 1748.
[1] 黄威,贲放,殷长春,孟庆敏,李文杰,廖桂香,吴珊,西永在. 三维时间域航空电磁任意各向异性正演模拟[J]. 应用地球物理, 2017, 14(3): 431-440.
[2] 胡英才, 李桐林, 范翠松, 王大勇, 李建平. 基于矢量有限元法的三维张量CSAMT正演模拟[J]. 应用地球物理, 2015, 12(1): 35-46.
版权所有 © 2011 应用地球物理
技术支持 北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司